• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维持火花的动态模型:荷兰医疗保健网络中的网络协调员如何保持网络承诺?

A dynamic model to sustain the spark: How do network coordinators in Dutch healthcare networks maintain network commitment?

作者信息

Roest Manon, van der Smissen Doris, Mannak Remco, Oerlemans Leon, Weggelaar-Jansen Anne Marie

机构信息

Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Organization Studies, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 22;20(7):e0326915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326915. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0326915
PMID:40694579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12282924/
Abstract

CONTEXT

In the Netherlands inter-organizational networks have been established to drive long-term healthcare improvement on a regional and national scale. Managing healthcare networks is challenging, especially in sustaining participants' active engagement. This study aims to empirically explore why participants' network commitment declined and how network commitment was managed by network coordinators.

METHODS

We conducted an exploratory qualitative study using purposive sampling we held semi-structured interviews with representatives from 18 Dutch healthcare improvement networks.

RESULTS

Respondents mentioned that allocated time and continued participant commitment was required to reach their goals. A key challenge was the decline in participant commitment over time due to misalignment of goals and needs, slow progress, lack of reciprocity, and resistance to change at the organizational level. Approaches to manage this were collaborative reassessment of goals and needs, expectation management, setting preconditions and fostering personal relationships.

DISCUSSION

Our findings highlight the importance of strategic timing of managerial approaches and their interdependencies with social mechanisms. These insights contribute theoretically to Ring and Van de Ven's framework on developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships and offer practical guidance for network managers aiming to maintain long-term commitment.

摘要

背景

在荷兰,已建立跨组织网络以推动区域和国家层面的长期医疗保健改善。管理医疗保健网络具有挑战性,尤其是在维持参与者的积极参与方面。本研究旨在实证探索参与者的网络承诺为何下降以及网络协调员如何管理网络承诺。

方法

我们进行了一项探索性定性研究,采用目的抽样法,对18个荷兰医疗保健改善网络的代表进行了半结构化访谈。

结果

受访者提到,需要分配时间并持续让参与者投入才能实现目标。一个关键挑战是,随着时间的推移,由于目标与需求不一致、进展缓慢、缺乏互惠以及组织层面的变革阻力,参与者的承诺有所下降。管理这一问题的方法包括对目标和需求进行协作性重新评估、期望管理、设定前提条件以及培养人际关系。

讨论

我们的研究结果凸显了管理方法的战略时机及其与社会机制的相互依存关系的重要性。这些见解在理论上为林和范德文关于合作性组织间关系发展过程的框架做出了贡献,并为旨在维持长期承诺的网络管理者提供了实践指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b223/12282924/0cfb5388572b/pone.0326915.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b223/12282924/0cfb5388572b/pone.0326915.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b223/12282924/0cfb5388572b/pone.0326915.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A dynamic model to sustain the spark: How do network coordinators in Dutch healthcare networks maintain network commitment?维持火花的动态模型:荷兰医疗保健网络中的网络协调员如何保持网络承诺?
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 22;20(7):e0326915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326915. eCollection 2025.
2
"Listening to understand," exploring postpartum women's perceptions of their social networks and social support in relation to their health behaviors and weight: A qualitative exploratory study.“倾听以理解”:一项定性探索性研究,探讨产后女性对其社交网络以及与健康行为和体重相关的社会支持的认知
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057241309774. doi: 10.1177/17455057241309774.
3
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
4
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
5
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”:对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
9
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
10
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Unravelling collaborative governance dynamics within healthcare networks: a scoping review.揭示医疗保健网络中协作治理的动态:范围综述。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Apr 10;39(4):412-428. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae005.
2
Getting our hopes up: How actors perceive network effectiveness and why it matters.期望落空:演员如何感知网络效果,以及为什么这很重要。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 May;325:115911. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115911. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
3
Charting a Course: A Research Agenda for Studying the Governance of Health Care Networks.
规划路线图:研究医疗保健网络治理的研究议程。
Adv Health Care Manag. 2022 Dec 12;21. doi: 10.1108/S1474-823120220000021006.
4
So Happy Together: A Review of the Literature on the Determinants of Effectiveness of Purpose-Oriented Networks in Health Care.《快乐在一起:目的导向型网络在医疗保健中的有效性决定因素文献综述》
Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Jun;80(3):266-282. doi: 10.1177/10775587221118156. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
5
An integrative perspective on interorganizational multilevel healthcare networks: a systematic literature review.组织间多层次医疗保健网络的综合视角:系统文献综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 18;22(1):923. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08314-6.
6
The role of quality improvement collaboratives in general practice: a qualitative systematic review.质量改进合作在全科医学中的作用:一项定性系统评价。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 May;11(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001800.
7
An Integrative Review of Organizational Factors Influencing Successful Large-Scale Changes in Healthcare.医疗机构内影响大规模变革成功的组织因素综合述评
J Nurs Adm. 2021 May 1;51(5):264-270. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001011.
8
Continued Counseling for the Relationship Between State-Level Medicine and Public Health.持续关注州级医学与公共卫生的关系。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Mar;60(3):e131-e138. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
9
Inter-organizational collaboration between healthcare providers.医疗服务提供者之间的组织间合作。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2021 Feb;34(1):36-46. doi: 10.1177/0951484820971456. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
10
Developing a Common Understanding of Networks of Care through a Scoping Study.通过范围界定研究建立关怀网络的共识。
Health Syst Reform. 2020 Sep 25;6(2):e1810921. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2020.1810921.