Calzada Olvera Beatriz, Gonzalez-Sauri Mario, Moya David-Alexander Harings, Louvin Federico
United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, the Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam - Institute for Housing and Urban Development, the Netherlands.
J Policy Model. 2022 Nov-Dec;44(6):1280-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
This paper examines how government support interacts with firm-level resilience capabilities in the reduction of layoffs among formal firms in Central America. Our analysis suggests that government support measures play a role in reducing the probability of layoffs among firms with dynamic resilience capabilities (i.e., those that are developed the pandemic onset). The effect of government support is not statistically different from the effect of static resilience capabilities alone (i.e., those that were present before the pandemic); thus, in firms with such capabilities, the effect of government support will be marginal. These results hold across sectors - exhibiting a marginally higher treatment effect in service sectors. Our results do not imply that Covid-19 supportive measures are to be disregarded, but instead raise the question of how government support policies could improve the allocation of support among firms in times of crises. Moreover, it underlines the necessity of policies that enhance resilience more broadly - a task that hints at structural issues and requires continuous government support in lieu of ad-hoc measures.
本文探讨了在中美洲正规企业裁员减少过程中,政府支持与企业层面的恢复力能力是如何相互作用的。我们的分析表明,政府支持措施在降低具有动态恢复力能力(即疫情爆发后发展起来的企业)的企业裁员概率方面发挥了作用。政府支持的效果与仅静态恢复力能力(即疫情前就存在的能力)的效果在统计上没有差异;因此,在具有此类能力的企业中,政府支持的效果将是微不足道的。这些结果在各部门都成立——在服务业中表现出略高的处理效果。我们的结果并不意味着应忽视新冠疫情支持措施,而是提出了一个问题,即政府支持政策如何在危机时期改善企业间支持的分配。此外,它强调了更广泛地增强恢复力的政策的必要性——这一任务暗示了结构性问题,需要政府持续支持而非临时措施。