Minoia Francesca, Lucioni Federica, Heshin-Bekenstein Merav, Vastert Sebastiaan, Kessel Christoph, Uziel Yosef, Lamot Lovro, Ruperto Nicolino, Gattorno Marco, Bracaglia Claudia, Toplak Natasa
Pediatric Immuno-Rheumatology Unit, Fondazione IRCSS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Dana Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Front Pediatr. 2022 Nov 9;10:1030083. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1030083. eCollection 2022.
Following the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic outbreaks, the hyperinflammatory condition termed Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) became a healthcare issue worldwide. Since December 2020 the mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 has become available with a good safety profile. However, evidence regarding safety and vaccination strategies in children with previous MIS-C is still lacking. The aim of our study was to investigate the current approach of international centers to anti-SARS-CoV-2 and other vaccinations in children with a history of MIS-C.
Physicians who care for patients with MIS-C were invited to anonymously complete a 15-question, web-based survey. The survey was open from October 6 to December 31, 2021.
A total of 290 replies from 236 centers in 61 countries were collected. Most respondents (86%) were pediatric rheumatologists. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was available in 85% of the countries. Sixty-seven centers (28%) in 22 countries already vaccinated MIS-C patients without adverse reactions in most cases (89%). Six reported complications: 2 not specified, 3 mild symptoms and 1 reported a MIS-C-like reaction. Most centers (84%) favored vaccinating MIS-C patients against SARS-CoV-2, after 3-6 months (40%), 6-12 months (52%) or >12 months (8%). The survey revealed broad heterogeneity of responses among healthcare providers within the same country and within the same center. The variable with the greatest impact on the decision not to vaccinate MIS-C patients was the current lack of evidence (51%), followed by patient/parent objection (40%). The most relevant parameters in the vaccination strategy were time from MIS-C episode (78%), immunosuppressive treatment (35%), SARS-CoV-2 serologic status (32%), and MIS-C features (31%). Almost all centers favored continuing regular vaccination with non-live (99%) and live (93%) vaccines; however, with high variability in suggested timelines.
To date, the experience of the international pediatric rheumatology community in vaccinating MIS-C patients against SARS-CoV-2 is overall reassuring. However, lack of evidence causes broad heterogeneity in vaccination strategy worldwide.
自冠状病毒病19(COVID-19)大流行爆发以来,儿童多系统炎症综合征(MIS-C)这种高炎症状态已成为全球范围内的一个医疗问题。自2020年12月以来,针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的信使核糖核酸(mRNA)疫苗已上市,且安全性良好。然而,关于既往有MIS-C病史儿童的安全性及疫苗接种策略的证据仍然不足。我们研究的目的是调查国际中心对有MIS-C病史儿童进行抗SARS-CoV-2及其他疫苗接种的当前方法。
邀请负责MIS-C患者的医生匿名完成一项基于网络的包含15个问题的调查。该调查于2021年10月6日至12月31日开放。
共收集到来自61个国家236个中心的290份回复。大多数受访者(86%)是儿科风湿病学家。85%的国家有抗SARS-CoV-2疫苗。22个国家的67个中心(28%)已为MIS-C患者接种疫苗,大多数情况下(89%)无不良反应。6个中心报告了并发症:2个未明确说明,3个为轻微症状,1个报告了类似MIS-C的反应。大多数中心(84%)倾向于在3至6个月后(40%)、6至12个月后(52%)或12个月后(>12个月,8%)为MIS-C患者接种抗SARS-CoV-2疫苗。调查显示,同一国家内及同一中心的医疗服务提供者之间的回答存在广泛异质性。对不接种MIS-C患者这一决定影响最大的变量是目前缺乏证据(51%),其次是患者/家长反对(40%)。疫苗接种策略中最相关的参数是距MIS-C发作的时间(78%)、免疫抑制治疗(35%)、SARS-CoV-2血清学状态(32%)和MIS-C特征(31%)。几乎所有中心都倾向于继续常规接种非活疫苗(99%)和活疫苗(93%);然而,建议的时间线差异很大。
迄今为止,国际儿科风湿病学界对MIS-C患者接种抗SARS-CoV-2疫苗的经验总体上令人放心。然而,证据的缺乏导致全球疫苗接种策略存在广泛异质性。