Department of Psychology, Emory University.
Dev Psychol. 2023 Feb;59(2):390-411. doi: 10.1037/dev0001480. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
During early childhood, reading books with one's caregiver (shared book reading) is a valuable means of supporting learning. Yet, there are gaps in our understanding of the influence of shared book reading on young children's science learning. The current research bridges this gap by examining the pedagogical quality of science books in preschool-aged children's environments and investigating how such books influence children's learning and caregivers' extratextual talk during shared book reading. In Study 1, we coded 60 science books that were readily available in young children's environments within the United States. The books were designed for English speakers and recommended for preschool-aged children. We coded the books for the extent to which they were Coherent (elaborated on facts presented by providing details, examples, comparisons, etc.) and included Embedded Questions. However, many books were low in Cohesion and Embedded Questions and were of low pedagogical quality. In Study 2, we tested thirty-eight 4- to 5-year-old children (55% female, 76% White) and their caregivers in the Southeastern United States. We assessed the influence of books' levels of Cohesion and Embedded Questions and of caregivers' Elaborative extratextual talk during shared book reading on children's science learning. Children learned more from books high in Cohesion, irrespective of levels of Embedded Questions and caregivers' Elaborative Talk. Additionally, children learned more from books high in Embedded Questions when caregivers used more Elaborative Talk. This research highlights the importance that books' textual features and social interactions during shared book reading have in promoting early science learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
在儿童早期,与照顾者一起阅读书籍(共享阅读)是支持学习的宝贵方式。然而,我们对共享阅读对幼儿科学学习的影响的理解存在差距。本研究通过检查学前儿童环境中科学书籍的教学质量,并调查这些书籍如何影响儿童的学习以及照顾者在共享阅读中的课外谈话,弥合了这一差距。在研究 1 中,我们对美国儿童环境中易于获得的 60 本科学书籍进行了编码。这些书是为讲英语的人设计的,推荐给学前儿童使用。我们对书籍进行了编码,以确定它们在多大程度上具有连贯性(通过提供细节、示例、比较等来详细说明呈现的事实)并包含嵌入式问题。然而,许多书籍的连贯性和嵌入式问题都很低,教学质量也很低。在研究 2 中,我们在美国东南部测试了 38 名 4 至 5 岁的儿童(55%为女性,76%为白人)及其照顾者。我们评估了书籍的连贯性和嵌入式问题的水平以及照顾者在共享阅读中的详尽课外谈话对儿童科学学习的影响。儿童从连贯性高的书籍中学到的东西更多,而不管嵌入式问题和照顾者的详尽谈话水平如何。此外,当照顾者使用更多的详尽谈话时,儿童从嵌入式问题较多的书籍中学到的东西更多。这项研究强调了书籍的文本特征和共享阅读中的社会互动在促进早期科学学习中的重要性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。