Suppr超能文献

用于精神疾病鉴别的多类别分类模型。

Multi-class classification model for psychiatric disorder discrimination.

作者信息

Emre İlkim Ecem, Erol Çiğdem, Taş Cumhur, Tarhan Nevzat

机构信息

Marmara University, Faculty of Business Administration, Department of Management Information Systems, İstanbul, Turkey; İstanbul University, Institute of Graduate Studies in Sciences, İstanbul, Turkey.

İstanbul University, Department of Informatics and Science Faculty Biology Department, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104926. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104926. Epub 2022 Nov 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physicians follow-up a symptom-based approach in the diagnosis of psychiatric diseases. According to this approach, a process based on internationally valid diagnostic tools such as The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or International Classification of Diseases (ICD), patient reports and the observation and experience of the physician is monitored. As in other fields of medicine, the search for biomarkers that can be used in processes related to diseases continues in psychiatry and various researches are carried out in this field.

OBJECTIVES

Within the scope of this study, a dataset containing electroencephalogram (EEG) measurements of individuals diagnosed with different psychiatric diseases were analyzed by machine learning methods and the diseases were differentiated/classified with the models obtained. Thus, it was investigated whether EEG data could be a biomarker for psychiatric diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the dataset analyzed within the scope of the study, for 550 patients (81 bipolar disorder, 95 attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder - ADHD, 67 depression, 34 obsessive compulsive disorder - OCD, 75 opioid, 146 posttraumatic stress disorder - PTSD, 52 schizophrenia) and 84 healthy individuals, there are 634 samples (rows), 77 variables (columns) in total. 76 of the variables consist of absolute power values belonging to 4 frequency bands (alpha, beta, delta, theta) collected from 19 different electrodes. 80 % of the dataset was used for training the models and 20 % of the data was used for testing the performance of the models. The 5-fold cross validation (CV) method, which repeats 3 times in the training dataset, was used and with this method, the hyperparameters used in the models were also optimized. Different models have been established with the selected hyperparameters and the performance of these models has been tested with the test dataset. C5.0, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural networks (ANN) were used to build the models.

RESULTS

Within the scope of the study, the absolute power values obtained from EEG measurements performed using 19 electrodes were analyzed by machine learning methods. It was concluded that classification between disease groups was feasible with a high accuracy (C5.0-0.841, SVM_radial - 0.841, RF - 0.762). It was observed that ADHD, depression and schizophrenia diseases can be differentiated better (F-score = 1, balanced accuracy = 1) once the results were evaluated on a class category basis according to the F- measure and balanced accuracy values.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Through the medium of the analyzes made within the scope of this study, it was investigated whether EEG data could be used as a biomarker for the detection and diagnosis of psychiatric diseases. The findings obtained from this study revealed that by using EEG data as a biomarker, it can be highly predicted whether a person has a psychiatric disease or not. Once evaluated with broad strokes, it is feasible to assert that it is possible to analyze whether the person who consults a physician with a complaint is ranked among the psychiatric disease class with EEG measurement. When trying to differentiate between numerous and diverse disease categories, it may be claimed that some diseases (ADHD, depression, schizophrenia) can be distinguished better by coming to the fore on a model basis. Considering the findings, it is anticipated that the analyzes obtained as a result of this study will contribute to the studies to be conducted using machine learning in the field of psychiatry.

摘要

背景

医生在精神疾病诊断中采用基于症状的方法。根据这种方法,基于国际上有效的诊断工具,如《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)或《国际疾病分类》(ICD),结合患者报告以及医生的观察和经验进行诊断。与其他医学领域一样,精神病学领域也在继续寻找可用于疾病相关过程的生物标志物,并开展了各种相关研究。

目的

在本研究范围内,通过机器学习方法分析了一个包含被诊断患有不同精神疾病个体的脑电图(EEG)测量数据集,并使用所得模型对疾病进行区分/分类。由此研究EEG数据是否可以作为精神疾病的生物标志物。

材料与方法

在本研究范围内分析的数据集中,共有550名患者(81例双相情感障碍、95例注意力缺陷多动障碍 - ADHD、67例抑郁症、34例强迫症 - OCD、75例阿片类药物成瘾、146例创伤后应激障碍 - PTSD、52例精神分裂症)和84名健康个体,总计634个样本(行)、77个变量(列)。其中76个变量由从19个不同电极采集的属于4个频段(α、β、δ、θ)的绝对功率值组成。数据集的80%用于训练模型,20%的数据用于测试模型性能。采用在训练数据集中重复3次的5折交叉验证(CV)方法,通过该方法还对模型中使用的超参数进行了优化。使用选定的超参数建立了不同模型,并使用测试数据集测试了这些模型的性能。使用C5.0、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和人工神经网络(ANN)来构建模型。

结果

在本研究范围内,通过机器学习方法分析了使用19个电极进行EEG测量获得的绝对功率值。得出结论,疾病组之间的分类具有较高的准确性(C5.0 - 0.841、SVM_radial - 0.841、RF - 0.762)是可行的。根据F值测量和平衡准确率值在类别基础上评估结果时,观察到ADHD、抑郁症和精神分裂症疾病可以更好地区分(F分数 = 1,平衡准确率 = 1)。

讨论与结论

通过本研究范围内进行的分析,研究了EEG数据是否可作为精神疾病检测和诊断的生物标志物。本研究获得的结果表明,将EEG数据用作生物标志物,可以高度预测一个人是否患有精神疾病。大致评估一下,可以断言通过EEG测量来分析有症状前来就诊的人是否属于精神疾病类别是可行的。当试图区分众多不同的疾病类别时,可以声称某些疾病(ADHD、抑郁症、精神分裂症)在模型基础上表现得更好区分。考虑到这些结果,预计本研究所得分析结果将有助于精神病学领域中使用机器学习进行的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验