• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创外科手术对接受辅助放疗的中高危宫颈癌患者的影响。

The impacts of minimally invasive surgery on intermediate- or high-risk cervical cancer patients received adjuvant radiotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.277, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710000, People's Republic of China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an, 710004, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov 28;20(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02820-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12957-022-02820-x
PMID:36443879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9703778/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrence for patients with risk factors after radical hysterectomy (RH). Early initiated CRT could result in superior oncological outcomes. Here, we aimed to compare the survival outcome of intermediate- or high-risk cervical cancer (CC) patients who, received adjuvant CRT between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery.

METHODS

Data on stage IB1-IIA2 patients who underwent RH and postoperative CRT in our institution, from 2014 to 2017, were retrospectively collected. Patients with high or intermediate-risk factors who met the Sedlis criteria received sequential chemoradiation (SCRT). According to the surgical approaches, the enrolled patients were divided into MIS and open surgery groups. Then, the disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 129 enrolled CC patients, 68 received open surgery and 61 received MIS. The median time interval from surgery to chemotherapy and to radiotherapy was shorter in the MIS group (7 days vs. 8 days, P=0.014; 28 days vs. 35, P<0.001). Three-year DFS and OS were similar in both groups (85.2% vs. 89.7%, P=0.274; 89.9% vs. 98.5%, P=0.499). Further, sub-analysis indicated that the DFS and OS in intermediate/high-risk groups had no significant difference. Cox-multivariate analyses found that tumor size >4 cm and time interval from surgery to radiotherapy beyond 7 weeks were adverse independent prognostic factors for DFS.

CONCLUSION

Based on the population we studied, for early-stage (IB1-IIA2) CC patients with intermediate- or high-risk factors who received postoperative SCRT, although the difference was not significant, the DFS and OS in the MIS group were slightly lower than the ORH group, and tumor size >4 cm and delayed adjuvant radiotherapy beyond 7 weeks were risk factors for recurrence.

摘要

背景

辅助放化疗(CRT)已被证明可降低根治性子宫切除术(RH)后具有危险因素的患者的复发风险。早期开始的 CRT 可能会带来更好的肿瘤学结果。在这里,我们旨在比较接受微创外科(MIS)和开腹手术的中高危宫颈癌(CC)患者接受辅助 CRT 的生存结果。

方法

回顾性收集了 2014 年至 2017 年在我院接受 RH 及术后 CRT 的 IB1-IIA2 期患者的数据。符合 Sedlis 标准的具有高危或中危因素的患者接受序贯放化疗(SCRT)。根据手术方式,将入组患者分为 MIS 和开腹手术组。然后分析无病生存率(DFS)、总生存率(OS)和预后因素。

结果

在 129 例 CC 患者中,68 例接受开腹手术,61 例接受 MIS。MIS 组化疗和放疗的手术间隔时间更短(7 天 vs. 8 天,P=0.014;28 天 vs. 35 天,P<0.001)。两组 3 年 DFS 和 OS 相似(85.2% vs. 89.7%,P=0.274;89.9% vs. 98.5%,P=0.499)。进一步的亚分析表明,中高危组的 DFS 和 OS 无显著差异。Cox 多因素分析发现,肿瘤大小>4cm 和手术至放疗时间间隔超过 7 周是 DFS 的不良独立预后因素。

结论

基于我们研究的人群,对于接受术后 SCRT 的早期(IB1-IIA2)CC 患者,中高危因素患者,MIS 组的 DFS 和 OS 略低于 ORH 组,肿瘤大小>4cm 和辅助放疗延迟 7 周以上是复发的危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5f/9703778/b5a23cc2bd76/12957_2022_2820_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5f/9703778/686e077d1a8a/12957_2022_2820_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5f/9703778/823a079372d9/12957_2022_2820_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5f/9703778/b5a23cc2bd76/12957_2022_2820_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5f/9703778/686e077d1a8a/12957_2022_2820_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5f/9703778/823a079372d9/12957_2022_2820_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5f/9703778/b5a23cc2bd76/12957_2022_2820_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The impacts of minimally invasive surgery on intermediate- or high-risk cervical cancer patients received adjuvant radiotherapy.微创外科手术对接受辅助放疗的中高危宫颈癌患者的影响。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov 28;20(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02820-x.
2
Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.对比微创根治性子宫切除术和传统开放性根治性子宫切除术在 Ib1 期-IIa2 期宫颈癌患者中的生存结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
3
Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.淋巴结比率是行微创根治性子宫切除术的早期宫颈癌患者的一个强有力的预后因素。
Yonsei Med J. 2021 Mar;62(3):231-239. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.3.231.
4
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.2018 年 FIGO 分期中微创与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的结局比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):824-828. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
5
Comparison of survival outcomes between radio-chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy with postoperative standard therapy in patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: long-term oncological outcome analysis in 37 Chinese hospitals.比较 IB1 期到 IIA2 期宫颈癌患者接受放化疗与根治性子宫切除术联合术后标准治疗的生存结局:37 家中国医院的长期肿瘤学结局分析。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6651-8.
6
Survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: A single-center retrospective study.早期 IB1 至 IIA2 期宫颈癌患者微创与开腹根治性子宫切除术的生存结局:单中心回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Apr 25;102(17):e33702. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033702.
7
Cervical conization before primary radical hysterectomy has a protective effect on disease recurrence in early cervical cancer: A two-center matched cohort study according to surgical approach.原发性根治性子宫切除术前行宫颈锥切术对早期宫颈癌疾病复发具有保护作用:一项根据手术方式进行的两中心配对队列研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Mar;164(3):535-542. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.023. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
8
Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.比较早期宫颈癌患者的开腹和微创根治性子宫切除术。
Int J Med Sci. 2021 Jan 19;18(5):1312-1317. doi: 10.7150/ijms.55017. eCollection 2021.
9
Open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: A two-center retrospective cohort study with pathologic review of usual-type adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma.早期宫颈癌经腹与经阴道广泛子宫切除术的疗效比较:一项包含普通型腺癌和腺鳞癌的病理回顾性两中心队列研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Oct;167(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
10
Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.微创外科手术与剖腹手术治疗早期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的比较:生存结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Mar;156(3):591-597. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.038. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Cervical cancer treatment in Rwanda: Resource-driven adaptations, quality indicators, and patient outcomes.卢旺达的宫颈癌治疗:资源驱动的适应性调整、质量指标和患者结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Feb;164(2):370-378. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
2
Late Toxicity After Adjuvant Conventional Radiation Versus Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer (PARCER): A Randomized Controlled Trial.辅助常规放疗与图像引导调强放疗治疗宫颈癌(PARCER)的晚期毒性:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Nov 20;39(33):3682-3692. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02530. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
3
Fertility-sparing surgery for women with stage I cervical cancer of 4 cm or larger: a systematic review.
保留生育功能手术治疗直径 4cm 及以上ⅠB1 期宫颈癌的系统评价
J Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Nov;32(6):e83. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e83. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
4
Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Minimally Invasive Surgery in Patients With Stage IA1-IIA1 Cervical Cancer.IA1-IIA1期宫颈癌患者微创手术后辅助放疗
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 26;11:690777. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.690777. eCollection 2021.
5
Impact of different therapies on the survival of patients with stage I-IIA cervical cancer with intermediate risk factors.不同治疗方法对伴有中度风险因素的Ⅰ-ⅡA期宫颈癌患者生存情况的影响。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(2):142. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7679.
6
Effectiveness of Sequential Chemoradiation vs Concurrent Chemoradiation or Radiation Alone in Adjuvant Treatment After Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: The STARS Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.子宫切除术辅助治疗宫颈癌的序贯放化疗与同期放化疗或单纯放疗的疗效比较:STARS 三期随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;7(3):361-369. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7168.
7
Impact of Adjuvant Radiotherapy on Survival Outcomes in Intermediate-Risk, Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Analyses Regarding Surgical Approach of Radical Hysterectomy.辅助放疗对中危早期宫颈癌生存结局的影响:关于根治性子宫切除术手术方式的分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 3;9(11):3545. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113545.
8
Comparison of long-term survival of total abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: Korean multicenter, retrospective analysis.比较早期宫颈癌患者行全腹广泛子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助经阴道广泛子宫切除术的长期生存:韩国多中心回顾性分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Dec;159(3):642-648. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.035. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
9
Comparative study on the oncological prognosis of laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage IIA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗ⅡA1 期宫颈鳞癌的肿瘤学预后比较研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;47(2):346-352. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.016. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
10
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.2018 年 FIGO 分期中微创与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的结局比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):824-828. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Jul 28.