• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淋巴结比率是行微创根治性子宫切除术的早期宫颈癌患者的一个强有力的预后因素。

Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2021 Mar;62(3):231-239. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.3.231.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2021.62.3.231
PMID:33635013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7934101/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether the prognostic impact of lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the ratio between the number of positive lymph nodes and removed lymph nodes, differs between open and minimally invasive surgical approaches for radical hysterectomy (RH) in node-positive, early-stage cervical cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB1-IIA2 patients who underwent primary type C RH between 2010 and 2018. Among them, only those with pathologically proven lymph node metastases who received adjuvant radiation therapy were included. The prognostic significance of LNR was investigated according to open surgery and minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

RESULTS

In total, 55 patients were included. The median LNR (%) was 9.524 (range, 2.083-62.500). Based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-off value for LNR (%) was determined as 8.831. Overall, patients with high LNR (≥8.831%; n=29) showed worse disease-free survival (DFS) than those with low LNR (<8.831%, n=26) (=0.027), whereas no difference in overall survival was observed. Multivariate analyses adjusting for clinicopathologic factors revealed that DFS was adversely affected by both MIS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 8.132; =0.038] and high LNR (adjusted HR, 10.837; =0.045). In a subgroup of open surgery cases, LNR was not associated with disease recurrence. However, in a subgroup of MIS cases, high LNR was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for DFS (adjusted HR, 14.578; =0.034).

CONCLUSION

In patients with node-positive, early-stage cervical cancer, high LNR was associated with a significantly higher disease recurrence rate. This relationship was further consolidated among patients who received MIS RH.

摘要

目的

确定在淋巴结阳性、早期宫颈癌中,以阳性淋巴结数量与切除淋巴结数量之比定义的淋巴结比率(LNR)对根治性子宫切除术(RH)的开放性和微创性手术方法的预后影响是否不同。

材料与方法

我们回顾性地确定了 2010 年至 2018 年间接受原发性 C 型 RH 的 2009 例国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期 IB1-IIA2 期患者。其中,仅纳入接受辅助放疗且有病理证实淋巴结转移的患者。根据开放性手术和微创手术(MIS)研究了 LNR 的预后意义。

结果

共纳入 55 例患者。中位 LNR(%)为 9.524(范围,2.083-62.500)。基于接收者操作特征曲线分析,确定 LNR(%)的截断值为 8.831。总体而言,LNR 较高(≥8.831%;n=29)的患者无病生存(DFS)较 LNR 较低(<8.831%,n=26)的患者差(=0.027),但总生存无差异。调整临床病理因素的多变量分析显示,DFS 受 MIS(调整后的危险比[HR],8.132;=0.038)和高 LNR(调整后的 HR,10.837;=0.045)的不利影响。在开放性手术病例亚组中,LNR 与疾病复发无关。然而,在 MIS 病例亚组中,高 LNR 是 DFS 的独立不良预后因素(调整后的 HR,14.578;=0.034)。

结论

在淋巴结阳性、早期宫颈癌患者中,高 LNR 与疾病复发率显著升高相关。在接受 MIS RH 的患者中,这种关系进一步得到了巩固。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e2/7934101/7f0a49009ccb/ymj-62-231-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e2/7934101/ada392681b6c/ymj-62-231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e2/7934101/3d4c78a64238/ymj-62-231-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e2/7934101/7f0a49009ccb/ymj-62-231-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e2/7934101/ada392681b6c/ymj-62-231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e2/7934101/3d4c78a64238/ymj-62-231-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e2/7934101/7f0a49009ccb/ymj-62-231-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.淋巴结比率是行微创根治性子宫切除术的早期宫颈癌患者的一个强有力的预后因素。
Yonsei Med J. 2021 Mar;62(3):231-239. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.3.231.
2
The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.淋巴结比值在经广泛子宫切除术和系统盆腔及主动脉旁淋巴结切除术行初始治疗的 IIIC 期宫颈癌患者中的预后价值。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan;31(1):e1. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e1. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
3
Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.对比微创根治性子宫切除术和传统开放性根治性子宫切除术在 Ib1 期-IIa2 期宫颈癌患者中的生存结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
4
Predictive value of number of metastatic lymph nodes and lymph node ratio for prognosis of patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIICp cervical cancer: a multi-center retrospective study.FIGO 2018 分期 IIICp 期宫颈癌患者转移淋巴结数量和淋巴结比值对预后的预测价值:一项多中心回顾性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):1005. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12784-8.
5
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].[I a2-II a2期宫颈癌腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术后的长期肿瘤学结局:一项配对队列研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):894-901.
6
Prognostic Factors and Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Early-stage Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Cervix.早期宫颈神经内分泌癌微创手术的预后因素及影响。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Nov-Dec;27(7):1558-1565. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
7
Lymph node ratio as an indicator of nodal status in the assessment of survival and recurrence in vulvar cancer: A cohort study.淋巴结比率作为评估外阴癌生存和复发的淋巴结状态指标:一项队列研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241285396. doi: 10.1177/17455057241285396.
8
Significance of lymph node ratio in defining risk category in node-positive early stage cervical cancer.淋巴结比率在确定淋巴结阳性早期宫颈癌风险类别中的意义
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jan;136(1):48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
9
Surveillance of radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the early experienced period of minimally invasive surgery in Japan.日本微创外科早期经验阶段早期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的监测。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec;26(12):2318-2330. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02017-4. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
10
Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in node-positive cervical cancer patients.淋巴结比率在淋巴结阳性宫颈癌患者中的预后意义。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(30):e11711. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011711.

引用本文的文献

1
The prognostic values of lymph node ratio for gynecological cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.淋巴结比率对妇科癌症的预后价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 1;14:1475348. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1475348. eCollection 2024.
2
Prognostic analysis of patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer treated by surgery.ⅡIC1p 期宫颈癌患者行手术治疗的预后分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun 21;21(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03076-9.
3
Rationality of FIGO 2018 IIIC restaging of cervical cancer according to local tumor size: A cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术与开放性根治性子宫切除术的生存比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jul 1;6(7):1019-1027. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1694.
2
Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study.接受腹式与微创根治性子宫切除术治疗的宫颈癌患者的复发率:一项多机构回顾性研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 1;38(10):1030-1040. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03012. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
3
FIGO 2018 ⅡIC 期宫颈癌局部肿瘤大小再分期的合理性:一项队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Aug;102(8):1045-1052. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14612. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
4
Recent Advances in Cervical Cancer Management: A Review on Novel Prognostic Factors in Primary and Recurrent Tumors.宫颈癌管理的最新进展:原发性和复发性肿瘤新预后因素综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 10;15(4):1137. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041137.
5
Prognostic Significance of Clinicopathological Factors Influencing Overall Survival and Event-Free Survival of Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.影响宫颈癌患者总生存和无事件生存的临床病理因素的预后意义:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Mar 9;28:e934588. doi: 10.12659/MSM.934588.
6
Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Characteristics in Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated with Radical Hysterectomy.根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌患者淋巴结特征的预后价值
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Oct 28;13:8137-8145. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S332612. eCollection 2021.
The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.
淋巴结比值在经广泛子宫切除术和系统盆腔及主动脉旁淋巴结切除术行初始治疗的 IIIC 期宫颈癌患者中的预后价值。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan;31(1):e1. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e1. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
4
Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.淋巴结比率在非小细胞肺癌中的预后价值:一项荟萃分析。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 24;50(1):44-57. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz120.
5
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Carcinoma: Interpreting the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer Trial Results.早期宫颈癌的微创手术:解读腹腔镜下宫颈癌试验结果
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 20;37(33):3075-3080. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02024. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
6
Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.《宫颈癌(第 3.2019 版)》,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jan;17(1):64-84. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0001.
7
Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.FIGO 修订版子宫颈癌分期。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Apr;145(1):129-135. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12749. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
8
Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.对比微创根治性子宫切除术和传统开放性根治性子宫切除术在 Ib1 期-IIa2 期宫颈癌患者中的生存结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
9
The lymph node status as a prognostic factor in colon cancer: comparative population study of classifications using the logarithm of the ratio between metastatic and nonmetastatic nodes (LODDS) versus the pN-TNM classification and ganglion ratio systems.淋巴结状态作为结肠癌的预后因素:使用转移和非转移淋巴结比值的对数(LODDS)与 pN-TNM 分类和神经节比系统对分类进行比较的人群研究。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):1208. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5048-4.
10
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.微创与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395. Epub 2018 Oct 31.