文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

淋巴结比率是行微创根治性子宫切除术的早期宫颈癌患者的一个强有力的预后因素。

Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2021 Mar;62(3):231-239. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.3.231.


DOI:10.3349/ymj.2021.62.3.231
PMID:33635013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7934101/
Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the prognostic impact of lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the ratio between the number of positive lymph nodes and removed lymph nodes, differs between open and minimally invasive surgical approaches for radical hysterectomy (RH) in node-positive, early-stage cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB1-IIA2 patients who underwent primary type C RH between 2010 and 2018. Among them, only those with pathologically proven lymph node metastases who received adjuvant radiation therapy were included. The prognostic significance of LNR was investigated according to open surgery and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). RESULTS: In total, 55 patients were included. The median LNR (%) was 9.524 (range, 2.083-62.500). Based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-off value for LNR (%) was determined as 8.831. Overall, patients with high LNR (≥8.831%; n=29) showed worse disease-free survival (DFS) than those with low LNR (<8.831%, n=26) (=0.027), whereas no difference in overall survival was observed. Multivariate analyses adjusting for clinicopathologic factors revealed that DFS was adversely affected by both MIS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 8.132; =0.038] and high LNR (adjusted HR, 10.837; =0.045). In a subgroup of open surgery cases, LNR was not associated with disease recurrence. However, in a subgroup of MIS cases, high LNR was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for DFS (adjusted HR, 14.578; =0.034). CONCLUSION: In patients with node-positive, early-stage cervical cancer, high LNR was associated with a significantly higher disease recurrence rate. This relationship was further consolidated among patients who received MIS RH.

摘要

目的:确定在淋巴结阳性、早期宫颈癌中,以阳性淋巴结数量与切除淋巴结数量之比定义的淋巴结比率(LNR)对根治性子宫切除术(RH)的开放性和微创性手术方法的预后影响是否不同。

材料与方法:我们回顾性地确定了 2010 年至 2018 年间接受原发性 C 型 RH 的 2009 例国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期 IB1-IIA2 期患者。其中,仅纳入接受辅助放疗且有病理证实淋巴结转移的患者。根据开放性手术和微创手术(MIS)研究了 LNR 的预后意义。

结果:共纳入 55 例患者。中位 LNR(%)为 9.524(范围,2.083-62.500)。基于接收者操作特征曲线分析,确定 LNR(%)的截断值为 8.831。总体而言,LNR 较高(≥8.831%;n=29)的患者无病生存(DFS)较 LNR 较低(<8.831%,n=26)的患者差(=0.027),但总生存无差异。调整临床病理因素的多变量分析显示,DFS 受 MIS(调整后的危险比[HR],8.132;=0.038)和高 LNR(调整后的 HR,10.837;=0.045)的不利影响。在开放性手术病例亚组中,LNR 与疾病复发无关。然而,在 MIS 病例亚组中,高 LNR 是 DFS 的独立不良预后因素(调整后的 HR,14.578;=0.034)。

结论:在淋巴结阳性、早期宫颈癌患者中,高 LNR 与疾病复发率显著升高相关。在接受 MIS RH 的患者中,这种关系进一步得到了巩固。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e2/7934101/7f0a49009ccb/ymj-62-231-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e2/7934101/ada392681b6c/ymj-62-231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e2/7934101/3d4c78a64238/ymj-62-231-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e2/7934101/7f0a49009ccb/ymj-62-231-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e2/7934101/ada392681b6c/ymj-62-231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e2/7934101/3d4c78a64238/ymj-62-231-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e2/7934101/7f0a49009ccb/ymj-62-231-g003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.

Yonsei Med J. 2021-3

[2]
The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.

J Gynecol Oncol. 2020-1

[3]
Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.

Gynecol Oncol. 2019-1-12

[4]
Predictive value of number of metastatic lymph nodes and lymph node ratio for prognosis of patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIICp cervical cancer: a multi-center retrospective study.

BMC Cancer. 2024-8-13

[5]
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015-12

[6]
Prognostic Factors and Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Early-stage Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Cervix.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020

[7]
Lymph node ratio as an indicator of nodal status in the assessment of survival and recurrence in vulvar cancer: A cohort study.

Womens Health (Lond). 2024

[8]
Significance of lymph node ratio in defining risk category in node-positive early stage cervical cancer.

Gynecol Oncol. 2015-1

[9]
Surveillance of radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the early experienced period of minimally invasive surgery in Japan.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2021-12

[10]
Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in node-positive cervical cancer patients.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
The prognostic values of lymph node ratio for gynecological cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Oncol. 2024-10-1

[2]
Prognostic analysis of patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer treated by surgery.

World J Surg Oncol. 2023-6-21

[3]
Rationality of FIGO 2018 IIIC restaging of cervical cancer according to local tumor size: A cohort study.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023-8

[4]
Recent Advances in Cervical Cancer Management: A Review on Novel Prognostic Factors in Primary and Recurrent Tumors.

Cancers (Basel). 2023-2-10

[5]
Prognostic Significance of Clinicopathological Factors Influencing Overall Survival and Event-Free Survival of Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Med Sci Monit. 2022-3-9

[6]
Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Characteristics in Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated with Radical Hysterectomy.

Cancer Manag Res. 2021-10-28

本文引用的文献

[1]
Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

JAMA Oncol. 2020-7-1

[2]
Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study.

J Clin Oncol. 2020-4-1

[3]
The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.

J Gynecol Oncol. 2020-1

[4]
Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020-1-24

[5]
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Carcinoma: Interpreting the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer Trial Results.

J Clin Oncol. 2019-11-20

[6]
Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019-1

[7]
Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019-1-17

[8]
Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.

Gynecol Oncol. 2019-1-12

[9]
The lymph node status as a prognostic factor in colon cancer: comparative population study of classifications using the logarithm of the ratio between metastatic and nonmetastatic nodes (LODDS) versus the pN-TNM classification and ganglion ratio systems.

BMC Cancer. 2018-12-4

[10]
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.

N Engl J Med. 2018-10-31

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索