Segalini Edoardo, Khan Mansoor, Podda Mauro, Gallo Gaetano, Morello Alessia, Marziali Irene, DI Saverio Salomone
Department of General and Emergency Surgery, ASST Ospedale Maggiore, Crema, Cremona, Italy.
University Hospitals Sussex NHSFT, Brighton, UK.
Minerva Surg. 2023 Feb;78(1):76-80. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5691.22.09799-4. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
Splenic injuries are one of the commonest occurrences in abdominal trauma. Nonoperative management (NOM) is the treatment of choice in hemodynamically stable patients with low grade injuries in the absence of vascular injury on CT; however, in some cases, NOM can fail and surgery is required. Traditionally, splenectomy is performed via laparotomy but, recently, the use of laparoscopy is rapidly increasing because the numerous advantages it offers for selected trauma patients.
A systematic review of the literature was performed through Medline for papers on the laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) in trauma patients, published from January 2006 to July 2022. The inclusion criteria were the study population consisted of hemodynamically stable adult patients treated with LS, as primary treatment or in case of complication or failure of NOM. The data extracted included gender, patient age, type of trauma, ISS, indication for LS and if LS was performed primary or secondary to NOM. The considered outcomes were operative time, length of stay, morbidity and mortality.
Eight papers were considered suitable for the study and all the articles were retrospective studies and only one of them was multicentered. A total of 202 patients were included in the study and all of these suffered splenic trauma and all patients were hemodynamically stable or responding to fluid resuscitation. Trauma mechanism was blunt in 92.9% of cases and penetrating in 7%. Twenty-one patients underwent LS after failure of angioembolization. Operative time of LS was reported in 6 papers and the mean was 130.7 mins. Length of stay was reported in 7 papers and the mean was 8.12 days. Overall morbidity was 7.7% and the postoperative mortality was cited in 6 articles with an overall percentage of 2.5%.
Laparoscopy should be considered a valid alternative to open surgery, in hemodynamically stable patients and when performed by an experienced surgeon, such as the minimally invasive trauma surgeon.
脾损伤是腹部创伤中最常见的情况之一。对于CT显示无血管损伤的低级别损伤且血流动力学稳定的患者,非手术治疗(NOM)是首选治疗方法;然而,在某些情况下,非手术治疗可能会失败,需要进行手术。传统上,脾切除术通过开腹手术进行,但最近,腹腔镜手术的应用正在迅速增加,因为它为特定的创伤患者提供了许多优势。
通过Medline对2006年1月至2022年7月发表的关于创伤患者腹腔镜脾切除术(LS)的论文进行了系统的文献综述。纳入标准是研究人群包括接受腹腔镜脾切除术治疗的血流动力学稳定的成年患者,作为主要治疗方法或在非手术治疗出现并发症或失败的情况下。提取的数据包括性别、患者年龄、创伤类型、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、腹腔镜脾切除术的指征以及腹腔镜脾切除术是作为主要治疗还是在非手术治疗之后进行。所考虑的结果包括手术时间、住院时间、发病率和死亡率。
八篇论文被认为适合该研究,所有文章均为回顾性研究,其中只有一篇是多中心研究。该研究共纳入202例患者,所有患者均遭受脾创伤,且所有患者血流动力学稳定或对液体复苏有反应。92.9%的病例创伤机制为钝性伤,7%为穿透伤。21例患者在血管栓塞失败后接受了腹腔镜脾切除术。六篇论文报告了腹腔镜脾切除术的手术时间,平均为130.7分钟。七篇论文报告了住院时间,平均为8.12天。总体发病率为7.7%,六篇文章引用了术后死亡率,总体百分比为2.5%。
对于血流动力学稳定的患者,当由经验丰富的外科医生(如微创创伤外科医生)进行手术时,腹腔镜手术应被视为开腹手术的有效替代方法。