Xue Gaoxu, Wang Qinyi, Cao Ling, Sun Jing, Yang Gongjun, Feng Youlong, Fang Fang
Jiangsu Institute for Food and Drug Control, Nanjing 210019, China;2. Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China.
School of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China.
Se Pu. 2022 Dec;40(12):1119-1127. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.05025.
The main methods currently used to detect illegally added chemicals in cosmetics include thin-layer chromatography, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography (GC), and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Compared with other analytical techniques, these methods have the advantages of high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, all of which are required in practical detection work. However, they also present a number of limitations, such as long analysis times and requirements for skilled operators and strictly controlled laboratory environments. Supervision, a growing trend in market surveillance, requires rapid and effective methods to screen illegally added chemicals. The suspected samples are sealed for some time and then sent to the laboratory for further testing. Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) is a new type of trace gas separation technology that was developed in recent years. The principle behind IMS is the separation and characterization of chemical species based on differences in the migration speed of their gas-phase ions under an electric field. As this technology has the advantages of miniaturization, easy operation, and quick responses, it is widely used in food and drug quality testing, as well as other related fields. However, it is rarely used in cosmetic detection, likely because the cosmetics matrix is highly complex, which can interfere with ion determination. Thus, optimizing the pretreatment process of cosmetics for IMS is important. In this work, solid-phase extraction (SPE) is combined with IMS to establish a method for the rapid screening of 14 antibacterial drugs in anti-acne cosmetics. The IMS detection parameters, sample extraction conditions, and SPE clean-up conditions (SPE column, type of leachate, type and volume of eluent) were studied and optimized in detail. The sample was extracted with 80%(v/v) acetonitrile aqueous solution (containing 0.2% (mass fraction) trichloroacetic acid), loaded onto an activated Oasis MCX SPE column, leached with 3.0 mL of methanol, and eluted with 1.0 mL of 2% ammonia methanol solution. The eluate was then directly injected into the IMS instrument. The IMS parameters were as follows: positive ion source voltage=2200 V, transfer tube voltage=8000 V, inlet temperature=180 ℃, transfer tube temperature=180 ℃, ion gate voltage=50 V, gate voltage pulse width=85 μs, and migration gas flow rate=1.2 L/min. The migration times for the 14 antibacterial drugs ranged from 11 to 17 ms, and the detection limits for the target compounds ranged from 0.2 to 1.2 μg/g. Owing to the narrow linear range of IMS, a quantitative method employing HPLC was also established to optimize the SPE pretreatment step and verify the positive samples. Chromatographic separation was conducted on a Phenomenex Luna C column (250 mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm), with a column flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and gradient elution with mobile phases A (0.01 mol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate adjusted to pH 4.0 with phosphoric acid) and B (acetonitrile). The column temperature was set to 35 ℃, and the injection volume was fixed at 5 μL. A total of 25 cosmetics samples were screened, and one positive sample was found to be consistent with the results of HPLC. The proposed method is fast, simple, and efficient, and it can be used for the rapid screening of the 14 antibacterial drugs in anti-acne cosmetics. Pretreatment can significantly reduce the influence of the cosmetic matrices on the determination results, improve instrument sensitivity, and effectively decrease the occurrence rate of false positives and negatives. The technique developed in this work can improve the efficiency of screening for illegally added chemicals and expand the applications of IMS for detecting various chemicals in complex matrices, such as cosmetics.
目前用于检测化妆品中非法添加化学物质的主要方法包括薄层色谱法、高效液相色谱法(HPLC)、气相色谱法(GC)以及液相色谱 - 质谱联用法(LC - MS)。与其他分析技术相比,这些方法具有灵敏度高、特异性强和准确性高的优点,而这些优点在实际检测工作中都是必需的。然而,它们也存在一些局限性,比如分析时间长,对操作人员技术要求高,且需要严格控制实验室环境。市场监管的趋势要求采用快速有效的方法来筛查非法添加的化学物质。疑似样品会被密封一段时间,然后送往实验室进行进一步检测。离子迁移谱(IMS)是近年来发展起来的一种新型痕量气体分离技术。IMS的原理是基于化学物质在电场作用下气相离子迁移速度的差异来分离和表征化学物质。由于该技术具有小型化、操作简便和响应快速的优点,它被广泛应用于食品和药品质量检测以及其他相关领域。然而,它很少用于化妆品检测,可能是因为化妆品基质非常复杂,会干扰离子测定。因此,优化化妆品用于IMS的预处理过程很重要。在这项工作中,将固相萃取(SPE)与IMS相结合,建立了一种快速筛查抗痤疮化妆品中14种抗菌药物的方法。详细研究并优化了IMS检测参数、样品萃取条件以及SPE净化条件(SPE柱、淋洗液类型、洗脱液类型和体积)。样品用80%(v/v)乙腈水溶液(含0.2%(质量分数)三氯乙酸)萃取,加载到活化的Oasis MCX SPE柱上,用3.0 mL甲醇淋洗,并用1.0 mL 2%氨甲醇溶液洗脱。然后将洗脱液直接注入IMS仪器。IMS参数如下:正离子源电压 = 2200 V,传输管电压 = 8000 V,进样口温度 = 180℃,传输管温度 = 180℃,离子门电压 = 50 V,门电压脉冲宽度 = 85 μs,迁移气体流速 = 1.2 L/min。14种抗菌药物的迁移时间在11至17 ms之间,目标化合物的检测限在0.2至1.2 μg/g之间。由于IMS的线性范围较窄,还建立了一种采用HPLC的定量方法来优化SPE预处理步骤并验证阳性样品。在Phenomenex Luna C柱(250 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm)上进行色谱分离,柱流速为1.0 mL/min,流动相A(0.01 mol/L磷酸二氢钾用磷酸调至pH 4.0)和B(乙腈)进行梯度洗脱。柱温设定为35℃,进样体积固定为5 μL。共筛查了25个化妆品样品,发现一个阳性样品与HPLC结果一致。所提出的方法快速、简单且高效,可用于快速筛查抗痤疮化妆品中的14种抗菌药物。预处理可显著降低化妆品基质对测定结果的影响,提高仪器灵敏度,并有效降低假阳性和假阴性的发生率。本工作中开发的技术可提高非法添加化学物质的筛查效率,并扩大IMS在检测复杂基质(如化妆品)中各种化学物质的应用。