VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):450-455. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07961-z. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, it is critical to understand characteristics that have allowed US healthcare systems, including the Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-federal hospitals, to mount an effective response in the setting of limited resources and unpredictable clinical demands generated by this system shock.
To compare the impact of and response to resource shortages to both VA and non-federal healthcare systems during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Cross-sectional national survey administered April 2021 through May 2022.
Lead infection preventionists from VA and non-federal hospitals across the US.
Surveys collected hospital demographic factors along with 11 questions aimed at assessing the effectiveness of the hospital's COVID response.
The response rate was 56% (71/127) from VA and 47% (415/881) from non-federal hospitals. Compared to VA hospitals, non-federal hospitals had a larger average number of acute care (214 vs. 103 beds, p<.001) and intensive care unit (24 vs. 16, p<.001) beds. VA hospitals were more likely to report no shortages of personal protective equipment or medical supplies during the pandemic (17% vs. 9%, p=.03) and more frequently opened new units to care specifically for COVID patients (71% vs. 49%, p<.001) compared with non-federal hospitals. Non-federal hospitals more frequently experienced increased loss of staff due to resignations (76% vs. 53%, p=.001) and financial hardships stemming from the pandemic (58% vs. 7%, p<0.001).
In our survey-based national study, lead infection preventionists noted several distinct advantages in VA versus non-federal hospitals in their ability to expand bed capacity, retain staff, mitigate supply shortages, and avoid financial hardship. While these benefits appear to be inherent to the VA's structure, non-federal hospitals can adapt their infrastructure to better weather future system shocks.
随着 COVID-19 大流行的发展,了解美国医疗保健系统(包括退伍军人事务部(VA)和非联邦医院)在资源有限且临床需求不可预测的情况下,为应对这一系统冲击而做出有效反应的特点至关重要。
比较 COVID-19 大流行期间 VA 和非联邦医疗保健系统资源短缺的影响和应对措施。
2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 5 月进行的横断面全国调查。
来自美国各地 VA 和非联邦医院的首席传染病预防专家。
调查收集了医院人口统计学因素以及 11 个旨在评估医院 COVID 应对有效性的问题。
VA 的回应率为 56%(71/127),非联邦医院的回应率为 47%(415/881)。与 VA 医院相比,非联邦医院的急性护理(214 张 vs. 103 张,p<.001)和重症监护病房(24 张 vs. 16 张,p<.001)床位数量更大。VA 医院更有可能报告在大流行期间没有个人防护设备或医疗用品短缺(17% vs. 9%,p=.03),并且更频繁地开设新单位专门收治 COVID 患者(71% vs. 49%,p<.001)与非联邦医院相比。非联邦医院因辞职(76% vs. 53%,p=.001)和大流行导致的财务困难(58% vs. 7%,p<0.001)而导致员工流失的情况更为频繁。
在我们基于调查的全国性研究中,首席传染病预防专家指出,VA 与非联邦医院在扩大床位容量、留住员工、缓解供应短缺和避免财务困难方面具有明显优势。虽然这些优势似乎是 VA 结构所固有的,但非联邦医院可以调整其基础设施,以更好地应对未来的系统冲击。