Oberberg Clinics Group, Hausvogteiplatz 10, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;22(1):2233. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14682-9.
Climate change, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the Ukraine crisis are considered unprecedented global stressors, potentially associated with serious health consequences. However, simultaneous effects of these stressors are not yet understood, making it difficult to evaluate their relative contribution to the population burden and potential future manifestations in clinically significant psychiatric disorders. This study aimed at disentangling the relative contribution of the three stressor groups on current sub-clinical stress symptoms.
A cross-sectional, representative survey study was conducted two months after the outbreak of the Ukraine war in Germany. Proportional quota sampling was applied for age, gender, income, and regional characteristics. Data were recruited by means of an online survey. 3094 data sets (1560 females) were included. Age ranged from 18-89 (M: 50.4 years; SD: 17.2). The Subclinical Stress Questionnaire (SSQ-25) served as main outcome measure. In collaboration with a professional media agency, 20 items were generated to capture salient population stressors. A three-factor exploratory structural equation model confirmed the appropriateness of this scale.
(1) Differences in subjective rankings revealed that stressors related to the Ukraine crisis were rated as most worrying, followed by climate change, and the Covid-19 pandemic (Generalized-Linear-Model: Epsilon = .97; F(1.94, 6001.14) = 1026.12, p < .001; η = .25). (2) In a linear regression model (R = .39), Covid-19 pandemic stressors were the only meaningful predictors for current ill-health (standardized β = .48). Ukraine crisis did not predict stress symptom profiles in the present sample. (3) Older and male individuals report less and/or less severe stress symptoms, although effect sizes were small (range: η .11-.21). An older age also reduced the impact of Covid-19 stressors.
Researchers from the health sciences must consider overlapping effects from population stressors. Although the Ukraine crisis and climate change mark salient stressors, including economic threats, the Covid-19 pandemic still has a profound effect on ill-health and must be considered as a relevant factor in future manifestations of psychiatric and associated health consequences.
气候变化、Covid-19 大流行和乌克兰危机被认为是前所未有的全球压力源,可能与严重的健康后果有关。然而,这些压力源的同时影响尚不清楚,这使得评估它们对人群负担的相对贡献以及在临床上显著的精神障碍中的潜在未来表现变得困难。本研究旨在厘清这三组压力源对当前亚临床应激症状的相对贡献。
这是一项在德国爆发乌克兰战争两个月后进行的横断面、代表性调查研究。采用年龄、性别、收入和区域特征的比例配额抽样。数据通过在线调查收集。共纳入 3094 份数据(女性 1560 名)。年龄在 18-89 岁之间(M=50.4 岁,SD=17.2)。主要结局测量指标为亚临床应激问卷(SSQ-25)。与专业媒体机构合作,生成了 20 个项目来捕捉突出的人口压力源。一个三因素探索性结构方程模型证实了该量表的适宜性。
(1)主观排名的差异表明,与乌克兰危机相关的压力源被评为最令人担忧的,其次是气候变化和 Covid-19 大流行(广义线性模型:Epsilon=.97;F(1.94, 6001.14)=1026.12,p<.001;η=.25)。(2)在线性回归模型中(R=.39),Covid-19 大流行压力源是当前健康不良的唯一有意义的预测因子(标准化β=.48)。在本样本中,乌克兰危机并没有预测到应激症状的特征。(3)年龄较大和男性的个体报告的压力症状较少且/或较不严重,尽管效应大小较小(范围:η.11-.21)。年龄较大也降低了 Covid-19 压力源的影响。
健康科学的研究人员必须考虑人口压力源的重叠影响。尽管乌克兰危机和气候变化标志着突出的压力源,包括经济威胁,但 Covid-19 大流行仍然对健康不良有深远的影响,必须被视为未来精神障碍和相关健康后果的一个相关因素。