Dutta Angshuman, Goyal Lovraj
Command Hospital Air Force, Old Airport Road, Bengaluru, 560007 India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):785-791. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01834-9. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
The complaint of nasal obstruction or difficulty in nasal breathing is highly subjective. The benefits of surgery vary depending upon patient perception and satisfaction. Along with objective methods like nasal endoscopy improvement in subjective score of patients symptoms is definitely an important outcome parameter of management. Assessing the disease specific quality of life outcomes of patients undergoing septoplasty by means of a questionnaire using nose scale and correlating it with diagnostic nasal endoscopic findings and clinical examination thirty patients above 17 years of age, with anatomical deviation of the nasal septum as the sole cause of obstruction and symptoms persisting for more than 3 months, underwent septoplasty. Degree of septal deviation was classified as per Mladina classification. Patients Nasal Obstruction & Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score were documented preoperatively and postoperatively and analysed. In our study it was found that there was significant improvement in nose scores which correlated with the improvement in nasal endoscopic findings. Use of NOSE score will help in letting the patient know his expected outcome following septoplasty and can be used as a predictor of successful surgery/an adjunct to clinical examination and nasal endoscopy in patients undergoing septoplasty. Disease specific health status instruments like Nose scale are needed along with objective outcome measures to compare disease-specific health status and symptom severity in patients before and after treatment. Similarly it could be used to assess differences in outcome when different surgical techniques are used. These subjective scales like nose scale can be used as along with to clinical examination and nasal endoscopy in the management of patients undergoing septoplasty.
鼻阻塞或鼻呼吸困难的主诉具有高度主观性。手术的益处因患者的感知和满意度而异。除了鼻内镜检查等客观方法外,患者症状主观评分的改善无疑是治疗的一个重要结果参数。通过使用鼻量表的问卷评估鼻中隔成形术患者的疾病特异性生活质量结果,并将其与诊断性鼻内镜检查结果和临床检查相关联。30例17岁以上患者,鼻中隔解剖偏曲为唯一阻塞原因且症状持续超过3个月,接受了鼻中隔成形术。鼻中隔偏曲程度根据姆拉迪纳分类法进行分类。记录患者术前和术后的鼻阻塞及症状评估(NOSE)评分并进行分析。在我们的研究中发现,鼻评分有显著改善,这与鼻内镜检查结果的改善相关。使用NOSE评分将有助于让患者了解鼻中隔成形术后的预期结果,并可用作手术成功的预测指标/辅助接受鼻中隔成形术患者的临床检查和鼻内镜检查。需要像鼻量表这样的疾病特异性健康状况工具以及客观结果测量方法,以比较治疗前后患者的疾病特异性健康状况和症状严重程度。同样,它可用于评估使用不同手术技术时的结果差异。这些像鼻量表这样的主观量表可与临床检查和鼻内镜检查一起用于鼻中隔成形术患者的管理。