• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视野检查中的红色标记和伪迹。

Red flags and artifacts in perimetry.

机构信息

Department of Glaucoma, Anand Eye Institute, 7-147/1, Nagendra Nagar, Habsiguda, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;70(12):4471. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1487_22.

DOI:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1487_22
PMID:36453382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9940581/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As perimetry is a psychophysical test, the thresholds obtained are not only dependent on the functional architecture of the visual system but also on a variety of physical and cognitive factors. Factors such as, Lens rim artifact, improper refraction, miosed pupil and blepharoptosis, can affect luminance thresholds. Additionally, cognitive factors such as patient's attention, motivation, fatigue, and response bias can influence the obtained thresholds.

PURPOSE

The video describes identification of various artifacts in Humphrey visual field printout and it has some useful teaching points to recognize and learn.

SYNOPSIS

Visual field test is critical for assessment and to document progression of glaucoma, but is prone to errors and artifacts. Fortunately, the patterns of such artifactual field loss are often characteristic and easily recognizable.

HIGHLIGHTS

Several types of errors can lead to inaccurate results. Proper instructions and patient supervision during the test helps to improve the test results. The technician should ensure correct patient's data entry. Careful examination of the obtained data on the printout is essential to detect any errors that can lead to misinterpretation of visual field, false alarms, and wrong clinical conclusion.

VIDEO LINK

https://youtu.be/OWdFk4pWJkM.

摘要

背景

由于视野检查是一种心理物理学测试,因此获得的阈值不仅取决于视觉系统的功能结构,还取决于各种物理和认知因素。例如,镜片边缘伪影、屈光不正、瞳孔缩小和眼睑下垂等因素会影响亮度阈值。此外,认知因素,如患者的注意力、动机、疲劳和反应偏差,也会影响获得的阈值。

目的

该视频介绍了识别 Humphrey 视野打印结果中各种伪影的方法,其中包含一些有用的教学要点,可帮助识别和学习。

概要

视野检查对于评估和记录青光眼的进展至关重要,但容易出现错误和伪影。幸运的是,这些人为的视野缺失模式通常具有特征性且易于识别。

重点

几种类型的错误可能导致结果不准确。在测试过程中,正确的指导和患者监督有助于提高测试结果。技术人员应确保正确输入患者的数据。仔细检查打印结果中的获取数据对于检测可能导致对视野的误解、误报和错误临床结论的任何错误至关重要。

视频链接

https://youtu.be/OWdFk4pWJkM。

相似文献

1
Red flags and artifacts in perimetry.视野检查中的红色标记和伪迹。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;70(12):4471. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1487_22.
2
Trigger happy" visual field: Ten pointers.“扳机指”样视野:十个要点。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;70(12):4471. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1310_22.
3
Hidden blind spot and pseudofixation loss.隐匿性视野缺损和假性定位丧失。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar;71(3):1057. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2843_22.
4
High false-positive response in perimetry.视野检查中出现高假阳性反应。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;71(10):3424. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_601_23.
5
Humphrey visual field made easy for residents.便于住院医师使用的 Humphrey 视野计。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 1;72(10):1535. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2519_23. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
6
Pseudo-loss of fixation in automated perimetry.自动视野检查中的假性固视丧失
Ophthalmology. 1991 Jan;98(1):76-8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32338-8.
7
Visual Field Artifacts From Face Mask Use.使用口罩导致的视野伪影。
J Glaucoma. 2020 Oct;29(10):989-991. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001605.
8
Sources of errors in measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using optical coherence tomography.光学相干断层扫描测量视网膜神经纤维层厚度的误差来源。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;71(2):674. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2118_22.
9
Lower threshold estimates at the onset of automated perimetry causing artefacts in perimetrically naive subjects.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008 Sep;28(5):492-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00586.x.
10
Is visual field evaluation using multiple correlations and linear regressions useful? An evaluation of Delphi perimetry.使用多重相关性和线性回归进行视野评估有用吗?德尔菲视野计评估。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998 Jul;236(7):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s004170050111.