• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
High false-positive response in perimetry.视野检查中出现高假阳性反应。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;71(10):3424. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_601_23.
2
Trigger happy" visual field: Ten pointers.“扳机指”样视野:十个要点。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;70(12):4471. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1310_22.
3
Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.使用SITA算法的Humphrey视野分析仪II周边视野计评估假阳性结果。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Oct;47(10):4632-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1598.
4
False Positive Responses in Standard Automated Perimetry.标准自动视野检查中的假阳性反应。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;233:180-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.06.026. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
5
Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).结构与功能评估(SAFE):I. 使用标准自动视野计(SAP)和短波长自动视野计(SWAP)评估青光眼性视野缺损的标准
Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Aug;134(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01577-5.
6
Detection and characterisation of visual field defects using Octopus perimetry in congenital glaucoma.应用 Octopus 视野计检测和分析先天性青光眼的视野缺损。
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed). 2024 Mar;99(3):91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.oftale.2023.11.015. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
7
Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma.视野可靠性指数在青光眼排除中的作用。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;133(1):40-4. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3609.
8
The performance of iPad-based noise-field perimeter versus Humphrey Field Analyser in detecting glaucomatous visual field loss.基于 iPad 的噪声场周边测量与 Humphrey 视野分析仪在检测青光眼视野损失方面的性能比较。
Eye (Lond). 2022 Apr;36(4):800-811. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01541-x. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
9
Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.多焦视觉诱发电位客观视野检查中半视野扇形分析方案在青光眼视野缺损诊断及早期检测中的评估
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;28(1):49-65. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.1.49. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
10
Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.正常受试者和青光眼患者的视觉诱发电位视野检查评估。
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002 Dec;80(6):620-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2002.800612.x.

视野检查中出现高假阳性反应。

High false-positive response in perimetry.

机构信息

Department of Glaucoma, Anand Eye Institute, Habsiguda, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;71(10):3424. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_601_23.

DOI:10.4103/IJO.IJO_601_23
PMID:37787253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10683677/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Humphrey visual field analyzer, the false-positive (FP) responses imply that the patient has pressed the response button despite no stimulus being seen at the time of response and FP rates >15% are flagged. The classical "Trigger happy" visual field has increased fixation loss, very high threshold retinal sensitivity with the values in supernormal range, "white scotoma" on grayscale map, high positive mean deviation (MD), glaucoma hemifield test (GHT) gives classification of "abnormally high sensitivity, 'Excessive high false positive' message is displayed," and pattern deviation probability plot has more defects than total deviation probability plot known as "reverse cataract pattern." However, these classical findings are not seen in all the cases of FP as the same thumb rule cannot be applied to all the visual fields with high FP.

PURPOSE

This video emphasizes the significance of careful examination of all the parameters in a visual field printout of high FP to interpret the test results and the caution needed when an FP response is seen in a patient with advanced glaucoma.

SYNOPSIS

The video presents some interesting visual fields in normal and glaucoma patients and the effect of high FP responses on MD, the different classification messages displayed for GHT, patterns of total deviation probability plot and pattern deviation probability plot, and how to identify the hidden FP.

HIGHLIGHTS

This video highlights the importance of careful examination of all the parameters in a visual field printout to interpret the test results. One should be especially cautious when an FP response is noted in a patient with advanced glaucoma, as the retinal sensitivity values may not be in supernormal range but are significantly affected by the increased FP. Clinician should be able to identify this and repeat the test as high FP reponses can lead to underestimation of visual field loss.

VIDEO LINK

https://youtu.be/T2SGZf16UzA.

摘要

背景

在 Humphrey 视野分析仪中,假阳性(FP)反应意味着患者在没有看到刺激的情况下按下了反应按钮,而 FP 率>15%则会被标记。经典的“Trigger happy”视野会导致固视损失增加,阈值视网膜敏感度非常高,处于超正常值范围,灰度图上出现“white scotoma”,平均偏差(MD)值为正,青光眼半视野测试(GHT)给出“异常高敏感度,‘过度高假阳性’信息显示”的分类,以及模式偏差概率图的缺陷比总偏差概率图多,被称为“反转白内障模式”。然而,并非所有 FP 病例都具有这些经典表现,因为同样的拇指规则不能应用于所有 FP 较高的视野。

目的

本视频强调了在 FP 较高的视野打印输出中仔细检查所有参数的重要性,以解释测试结果,并在高级青光眼患者中出现 FP 反应时需要谨慎。

概要

本视频介绍了正常和青光眼患者的一些有趣视野,以及 FP 高反应对 MD 的影响、GHT 显示的不同分类信息、总偏差概率图和模式偏差概率图的模式、以及如何识别隐藏的 FP。

重点

本视频强调了仔细检查视野打印输出中所有参数以解释测试结果的重要性。当在高级青光眼患者中注意到 FP 反应时,应特别小心,因为视网膜敏感度值可能不在超正常值范围内,但会受到增加的 FP 的显著影响。临床医生应该能够识别出这一点并重复测试,因为 FP 高反应可能导致低估视野损失。

视频链接

https://youtu.be/T2SGZf16UzA。