• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新的异常现象:识别和评估土地交易市场中的异常情况。

The new abnormal: Identifying and ranking anomalies in the land trade market.

机构信息

CIRAD, UMR TETIS, Montpellier, France.

TETIS, Univ. Montpellier, AgroParisTech, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277608. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0277608
PMID:36454792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9714739/
Abstract

Large-scale national and transnational commercial land transactions, or Large-Scale Land Acquisitions (LSLAs), have been gaining a lot of academic attention since the late 2000s and since the reported rush for land, resulting in turn from an increase in demand for arable land. If many data exist to characterize land deals, the analysis of investment networks remain limited and predominantly portrays power asymmetries between countries from the Global North investing in the Global South. The aim of this work is to perform a deeper investigation on the land trade market, specifically focusing on cases that do not follow such narratives. For instance, almost 25% of the countries included in the transnational land trade network do not follow a strict investor/target dichotomy, thus being characterized by a double role, i.e., they both acquire and cede land in the transnational context. In order to globally acknowledge for what was currently considered as abnormal cases, we model open access data about LSLAs extracted from the Land Matrix Initiative (LMI) open-access database into a network graph, and adapt an eigenvector based centrality method originally conceived for online social networks, namely LurkerRank, to identify and rank anomalous profiles in the land trade market. We take into account three different network snapshots: a multi-sector network (including all the transnational deals in the LMI database), and three networks referring to specific investment sectors (agriculture,mines and biofuels). Experimental results show that emerging economies (e.g., China and Malaysia) play a central role in the land trade market, by creating alternative dynamics that escape the classic North/South one. Our analyses also show how African countries that are often seen as targets of land trade transactions in a specific sector, may often acquire foreign land in the context of investments in the same sector (i.e., Zimbabwe for biofuels and the Democratic Republic of Congo for the mining sector).

摘要

大规模国家和跨国商业土地交易,或大规模土地收购(LSLAs),自 21 世纪 10 年代后期以来,由于对耕地需求的增加,导致土地抢购热潮,引起了学术界的广泛关注。尽管有许多数据可以用来描述土地交易,但投资网络的分析仍然有限,主要描绘了从全球北方国家向全球南方国家投资的国家之间的权力不对称。这项工作的目的是对土地交易市场进行更深入的调查,特别是关注那些不符合这些叙述的案例。例如,跨国土地交易网络中约有 25%的国家不符合严格的投资者/目标二分法,因此具有双重角色,即在跨国背景下既获得土地又出让土地。为了在全球范围内承认当前被认为是异常的情况,我们将从土地矩阵倡议(LMI)开放访问数据库中提取的关于大规模土地收购的开放访问数据建模为一个网络图,并采用一种最初为在线社交网络设计的基于特征向量的中心性方法,即潜伏者排名(LurkerRank),来识别和排名土地交易市场中的异常配置文件。我们考虑了三个不同的网络快照:一个多部门网络(包括 LMI 数据库中的所有跨国交易),以及三个特定投资部门(农业、矿业和生物燃料)的网络。实验结果表明,新兴经济体(如中国和马来西亚)在土地交易市场中发挥着核心作用,通过创造替代动力,摆脱了经典的南北模式。我们的分析还表明,在特定部门的土地交易中经常被视为目标的非洲国家,在同一部门的投资背景下可能会获得外国土地(例如,生物燃料方面的津巴布韦和矿业方面的刚果民主共和国)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bcf/9714739/7583118354bc/pone.0277608.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bcf/9714739/839a0c809375/pone.0277608.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bcf/9714739/068d8c9e35ab/pone.0277608.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bcf/9714739/4741954ae9c7/pone.0277608.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bcf/9714739/d9250928ee22/pone.0277608.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bcf/9714739/82acc185a267/pone.0277608.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bcf/9714739/7583118354bc/pone.0277608.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bcf/9714739/839a0c809375/pone.0277608.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bcf/9714739/068d8c9e35ab/pone.0277608.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bcf/9714739/4741954ae9c7/pone.0277608.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bcf/9714739/d9250928ee22/pone.0277608.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bcf/9714739/82acc185a267/pone.0277608.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bcf/9714739/7583118354bc/pone.0277608.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The new abnormal: Identifying and ranking anomalies in the land trade market.新的异常现象:识别和评估土地交易市场中的异常情况。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277608. eCollection 2022.
2
The parable of arable land: Characterizing large scale land acquisitions through network analysis.耕地寓言:通过网络分析刻画大规模土地收购
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 13;15(10):e0240051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240051. eCollection 2020.
3
Competition for water induced by transnational land acquisitions for agriculture.跨国土地收购引发的农业用水竞争。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jan 26;13(1):505. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28077-2.
4
Governance of the wildlife trade and the prevention of emerging zoonoses: a mixed methods network analysis of transnational organisations, silos, and power dynamics.野生动物贸易治理与新发人畜共患病的预防:跨国组织、筒仓及权力动态的混合方法网络分析。
Global Health. 2024 Jun 20;20(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01055-7.
5
Large-Scale Land Acquisition and Its Effects on the Water Balance in Investor and Host Countries.大规模土地收购及其对投资国和东道国水平衡的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 4;11(3):e0150901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150901. eCollection 2016.
6
Resource frontiers and agglomeration economies: The varied logics of transnational land-based investing in Southern and Eastern Africa.资源前沿与集聚经济:跨国在非陆基投资于南部和东部非洲的多样逻辑。
Ambio. 2022 Jun;51(6):1535-1551. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01682-z. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
7
Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector sustainability.寻找实现国家规模土地部门可持续性的途径。
Nature. 2017 Apr 12;544(7649):217-222. doi: 10.1038/nature21694.
8
Connected and extracted: Understanding how centrality in the global wheat supply chain affects global hunger using a network approach.关联与提取:利用网络方法理解全球小麦供应链中的中心地位如何影响全球饥饿问题。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 15;17(6):e0269891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269891. eCollection 2022.
9
China can feed its people: views from the White Paper on food security in China.中国能够养活自己:来自《中国的粮食安全》白皮书的观点。
China Popul Today. 1996 Dec;13(5-6):23-4.
10
Land grabbing: a preliminary quantification of economic impacts on rural livelihoods.土地掠夺:对农村生计经济影响的初步量化
Popul Environ. 2014;36(2):180-192. doi: 10.1007/s11111-014-0215-2.

本文引用的文献

1
The parable of arable land: Characterizing large scale land acquisitions through network analysis.耕地寓言:通过网络分析刻画大规模土地收购
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 13;15(10):e0240051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240051. eCollection 2020.