Suppr超能文献

智能手机应用程序“ecofit”中肌肉健康自我评估的有效性:一项相关性研究。

Validity of muscular fitness self-assessments in the ecofit smartphone application: A correlation study.

机构信息

Centre for Active Living and Learning, School of Education, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.

Active Living Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278374. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mobile app-based interventions have the potential for wide-reach and therefore may be a useful tool in up-scaling physical activity interventions. In larger-scale interventions, face-to-face assessments are less cost-effective, and researchers often rely on surveys or activity trackers to assess outcomes. However, there is limited evidence of valid muscular fitness assessments that can be self-administered within mHealth interventions. As such, this study will evaluate the concurrent validity of upper and lower body muscular fitness that have been independently assessed by participants via the ecofit app, and face-to-face assessments conducted by a trained researcher.

METHODS

This study compared baseline data from two muscular fitness tests from the ecofit two-armed randomised controlled trial and self-assessed data collected via the ecofit smartphone app (i.e., validated 90-degree push-up and 60-second sit-to-stand test). To assess the concurrent validity, the self-assessed push-up and sit-to-stand tests (i.e., collected via the ecofit app) were correlated using Spearman's correlation coefficient against the researcher-assessed results (i.e., objective results collected during baseline assessment for the ecofit trial). Bland-Altman plots were also used to allow visualisation of the differences between the self- and research-assessed tests.

RESULTS

Participants (N = 54) completed the push-up (24.1%) and sit-to-stand (100%) tests within 14-days of receiving the app. The results revealed a strong significant correlation for the push-up test (0.83, p<0.001) and a moderate significant correlation for the sit-to-stand test (0.63, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study provides support for the concurrent validity of self-reported upper and lower body muscular fitness assessments (i.e., the push-up and sit-to-stand tests) in mHealth. While these tests may be a feasible option for large scale physical activity interventions, more research is needed to determine the generalisability of these results.

摘要

背景

基于移动应用程序的干预措施具有广泛覆盖的潜力,因此可能是扩大体育活动干预措施的有用工具。在更大规模的干预措施中,面对面评估的成本效益较低,研究人员通常依赖调查或活动追踪器来评估结果。然而,能够在移动健康干预措施中自我评估的肌肉健康评估方法的有效性证据有限。因此,本研究将评估参与者通过 ecofit 应用程序独立评估的上半身和下半身肌肉健康状况的同时效度,并评估经过培训的研究人员进行的面对面评估。

方法

本研究比较了 ecofit 双臂随机对照试验基线数据和通过 ecofit 智能手机应用程序自我评估收集的数据(即,经过验证的 90 度俯卧撑和 60 秒坐站测试)。为了评估同时效度,使用 Spearman 相关系数将自我评估的俯卧撑和坐站测试(即通过 ecofit 应用程序收集)与研究人员评估的结果(即 ecofit 试验基线评估期间收集的客观结果)进行相关性分析。还使用 Bland-Altman 图来直观地显示自我评估和研究评估测试之间的差异。

结果

54 名参与者在收到应用程序后的 14 天内完成了俯卧撑(24.1%)和坐站(100%)测试。结果显示,俯卧撑测试的相关性很强(0.83,p<0.001),坐站测试的相关性为中度显著(0.63,p<0.001)。

结论

本研究为移动健康中自我报告的上下身肌肉健康评估(即俯卧撑和坐站测试)的同时效度提供了支持。虽然这些测试可能是大规模体育活动干预的可行选择,但需要更多的研究来确定这些结果的普遍性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e505/9714846/70794e4ffe77/pone.0278374.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验