Suppr超能文献

单纯钩钢板、钩钢板联合缝线锚钉与关节镜下经皮张力带固定治疗急性 V 型肩锁关节脱位的比较。

Comparison of hook plate alone, hook plate augmented with suture anchor, and arthroscopically-assisted tightrope fixation in the treatment of patients with acute type v acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

机构信息

Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Jun;109(4):103494. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103494. Epub 2022 Nov 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The best treatment for Rockwood type V acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is unknown.

HYPOTHESIS

Hook plate augmented with suture anchor (HA) may have different clinical and radiological results than hook plate alone (H), and arthroscopically assisted TightRope (TR) techniques in treating acute type V AC joint dislocations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 71 patients with acute type V AC joint dislocations between December 2010 and August 2018. Patients were categorized into three groups: H group (n=22), HA group (n=23) and TR group (n=26). We measured the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) differences and CCD ratio compared to uninjured side pre-operatively, immediately post-operatively, at 3-month and 2-year after operation. Clinical outcomes were assessed as well at the same time points. Loss of correction was determined by the CCD difference and ratio between surgical and uninjured sides.

RESULTS

The mean age and follow-up period were 41.8±24.7 years and 30.2±4.3 months, respectively. No significant differences were found in the demographic data between the three groups. The HA group presented a trend of less overcorrection but without significance compared with the H group at immediately post-operation, 3-month, and 2-year follow-up. (CCD difference: -2.4mm vs. -3.7mm, -1.6mm vs. -1.8, and 0.2mm vs -1.9mm, CCD ratio: 67.7% vs. 40.9%, 79.3% vs. 70.1%, and 100.6% vs. 86.5%, respectively). The HA group also had significantly less loss of correction compared with the TR group at 3-month and 2-year after the operation (CCD difference: -1.6mm vs. 1.6mm, 0.2mm vs. 2.4mm; CCD ratio: 79.3% vs. 122.2%, 100.6% vs. 136.1%, all p<0.05). All three methods achieved significant improvement in function and pain without inter-group differences. No coracoid-related or tunnel complications occurred.

DISCUSSION

The hook plate alone, and hook plate with suture anchor augmentation techniques provided less residual vertical instability compared to TightRope fixation at 2-year follow-up. The patient-reported functional outcomes were promising and comparable among the three groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

摘要

简介

Rockwood Ⅴ型肩锁关节(AC)脱位的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。

假设

与单纯钩板(H)相比,钩板加缝线锚(HA)可能具有不同的临床和影像学结果,并且关节镜辅助的 TightRope(TR)技术在治疗急性Ⅴ型 AC 关节脱位方面也具有不同的结果。

材料和方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2010 年 12 月至 2018 年 8 月期间的 71 例急性Ⅴ型 AC 关节脱位患者。患者分为三组:H 组(n=22)、HA 组(n=23)和 TR 组(n=26)。我们测量了术前、术后即刻、术后 3 个月和 2 年与健侧相比的喙锁间距(CCD)差异和 CCD 比值。同时在相同时间点评估临床结果。通过手术侧和健侧的 CCD 差值和比值来确定矫正丢失情况。

结果

平均年龄和随访时间分别为 41.8±24.7 岁和 30.2±4.3 个月。三组之间的人口统计学数据无显著差异。与 H 组相比,HA 组在术后即刻、3 个月和 2 年随访时存在过度矫正趋势,但无统计学意义。(CCD 差值:-2.4mm 比-3.7mm、-1.6mm 比-1.8mm 和 0.2mm 比-1.9mm;CCD 比值:67.7% 比 40.9%、79.3% 比 70.1% 和 100.6% 比 86.5%)。与 TR 组相比,HA 组在术后 3 个月和 2 年时的矫正丢失也明显较少(CCD 差值:-1.6mm 比 1.6mm、0.2mm 比 2.4mm;CCD 比值:79.3% 比 122.2%、100.6% 比 136.1%,均 p<0.05)。所有三种方法在功能和疼痛方面均有显著改善,且组间无差异。没有发生喙突相关或隧道并发症。

讨论

与 TightRope 固定相比,单纯钩板和钩板加缝线锚固定在 2 年随访时,残余垂直不稳定性更小。三组患者的报告功能结果均有希望且相似。

证据等级

III,回顾性比较治疗试验。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验