Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jun;31(6):1122-1136. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
The need for operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is unclear. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the outcomes after operative treatment with a hook plate with the outcomes after nonoperative treatment of acute Rockwood type III and type V AC joint dislocations separately.
The inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-65 years with an acute type III or type V AC joint dislocation with the availability to start treatment within 3 weeks after trauma. All patients received the same standardized outpatient rehabilitation protocol and were followed up for 24 months. Assessments were based on radiographs, clinical examination findings, and questionnaires. The primary outcome was the Constant score (CS). The secondary outcomes were as follows: Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), QuickDASH score (abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire), shoulder pain at rest and during movement rated using a visual analog scale, EQ-5D (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions) score, patient satisfaction, cosmesis, complications, and adverse events. The 4 groups were compared using 1-way analysis of variance and intention to treat.
The included patients (N = 124) (mean age, 40 years [range, 18-64 years]; 91% male patients) were randomized, stratified by type, to nonoperative treatment (type III, n = 33; type V, n = 30) or operative treatment with a hook plate (type III, n = 30; type V, n = 31) at a single center. Three patients randomized to physiotherapy dropped out before any follow-up measures, leaving 121 patients in the study. Complete clinical follow-up data were obtained from 118 patients at 24 months. At 3 months, patients in both nonoperatively treated groups had a significantly better mean CS, SSV, and QuickDASH score and had less pain at rest and during movement compared with patients treated operatively. At 6, 12, and 24 months, there were no significant differences in the CS, SSV, QuickDASH score, pain, or EQ-5D score between the groups regardless of intervention. At 24 months, the mean CS was 88 for nonoperatively treated type III patients vs. 91 for operatively treated type III patients and was 90 vs. 91 for type V patients (P = .477). At final follow-up, patients had regained 97% of the mean CS comparing the uninjured and injured shoulders and 86% of the patients rated the result as excellent or good. Eleven patients assigned to nonoperative treatment (18%, 6 type III and 5 type V) underwent surgery within 19 months.
Both the nonoperative and operative treatment groups had very good restoration of shoulder function and patient satisfaction at 24 months, and operative treatment did not lead to better outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment. In conclusion, our study does not support surgery with a hook plate in patients with acute Rockwood type III or type V AC joint dislocations.
急性肩锁关节(AC)脱位需要手术治疗的情况并不明确。本随机对照试验的目的是分别比较急性 Rockwood Ⅲ型和Ⅴ型 AC 关节脱位采用钩钢板手术治疗与非手术治疗的结果。
纳入标准为年龄在 18-65 岁之间、急性 Rockwood Ⅲ型或Ⅴ型 AC 关节脱位患者,受伤后 3 周内开始治疗。所有患者均接受相同的标准化门诊康复方案,并随访 24 个月。评估基于影像学、临床检查结果和问卷调查。主要结局指标是 Constant 评分(CS)。次要结局指标包括:主观肩部值(SSV)、QuickDASH 评分(手臂、肩部和手残疾问卷的缩写版)、静息和运动时的肩部疼痛(使用视觉模拟量表评估)、EQ-5D(欧洲生活质量 5 维度)评分、患者满意度、美容效果、并发症和不良事件。使用单因素方差分析和意向治疗比较 4 组。
纳入的患者(N=124)(平均年龄 40 岁[范围,18-64 岁];91%为男性患者)按类型在单一中心被随机分为非手术治疗(Ⅲ型,n=33;Ⅴ型,n=30)或钩钢板手术治疗(Ⅲ型,n=30;Ⅴ型,n=31)。3 名随机接受物理治疗的患者在任何随访措施之前退出,121 名患者进入研究。118 名患者在 24 个月时获得完整的临床随访数据。3 个月时,两组非手术治疗患者的 CS、SSV 和 QuickDASH 评分明显更高,静息和运动时疼痛明显减轻,与手术治疗患者相比。6、12 和 24 个月时,无论干预措施如何,各组的 CS、SSV、QuickDASH 评分、疼痛或 EQ-5D 评分均无显著差异。24 个月时,非手术治疗的Ⅲ型患者 CS 平均为 88 分,手术治疗的Ⅲ型患者 CS 平均为 91 分,Ⅴ型患者 CS 平均为 90 分,与手术治疗的患者 CS 平均为 91 分(P=0.477)。最终随访时,患者受伤和未受伤肩部的 CS 平均恢复了 97%,86%的患者认为结果为优秀或良好。11 名被分配接受非手术治疗的患者(18%,6 例Ⅲ型和 5 例Ⅴ型)在 19 个月内接受了手术。
两组非手术和手术治疗组在 24 个月时肩部功能和患者满意度均有非常好的恢复,手术治疗与非手术治疗相比并未带来更好的结果。综上所述,我们的研究结果不支持对急性 Rockwood Ⅲ型或Ⅴ型 AC 关节脱位患者采用钩钢板手术治疗。