Bertels Frederic, Rainey Paul B
Department of Microbial Population Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Laboratory of Biophysics and Evolution, CBI, ESPCI Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, Paris, France.
Bioessays. 2023 Feb;45(2):e2200085. doi: 10.1002/bies.202200085. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
Integrative mobile genetic elements (MGEs), such as transposons and insertion sequences, propagate within bacterial genomes, but persistence times in individual lineages are short. For long-term survival, MGEs must continuously invade new hosts by horizontal transfer. Theoretically, MGEs that persist for millions of years in single lineages, and are thus subject to vertical inheritance, should not exist. Here we draw attention to an exception - a class of MGE termed REPIN. REPINs are non-autonomous MGEs whose duplication depends on non-jumping RAYT transposases. Comparisons of REPINs and typical MGEs show that replication rates of REPINs are orders of magnitude lower, REPIN population size fluctuations correlate with changes in available genome space, REPIN conservation depends on RAYT function, and REPIN diversity accumulates within host lineages. These data lead to the hypothesis that REPINs form enduring, beneficial associations with eubacterial chromosomes. Given replicative nesting, our hypothesis predicts conflicts arising from the diverging effects of selection acting simultaneously on REPINs and host genomes. Evidence in support comes from patterns of REPIN abundance and diversity in two distantly related bacterial species. Together this bolsters the conclusion that REPINs are the genetic counterpart of mutualistic endosymbiotic bacteria.
整合型移动遗传元件(MGEs),如转座子和插入序列,在细菌基因组中传播,但其在单个谱系中的持续时间很短。为了长期存活,MGEs必须通过水平转移不断侵入新宿主。从理论上讲,在单个谱系中持续存在数百万年并因此经历垂直遗传的MGEs不应该存在。在这里,我们要关注一个例外——一类被称为REPIN的MGEs。REPINs是非自主MGEs,其复制依赖于非跳跃性的RAYT转座酶。对REPINs和典型MGEs的比较表明,REPINs的复制速率要低几个数量级,REPIN种群大小的波动与可用基因组空间的变化相关,REPIN的保守性取决于RAYT功能,并且REPIN多样性在宿主谱系中积累。这些数据引出了一个假说,即REPINs与真细菌染色体形成了持久的、有益的关联。鉴于复制嵌套,我们的假说预测,由于选择对REPINs和宿主基因组同时产生的不同影响,会产生冲突。支持这一观点的证据来自两种远缘细菌物种中REPIN丰度和多样性的模式。这些共同支持了这样一个结论,即REPINs是互利共生内共生细菌的遗传对应物。