Suppr超能文献

出勤主义的健康绩效框架:一项概念验证研究。

The health-performance framework of presenteeism: A proof-of-concept study.

作者信息

Biron Caroline, Karanika-Murray Maria, Ivers Hans

机构信息

Department of Management, Faculty of Business Administration, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.

VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Québec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 15;13:1029434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1029434. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

There is emerging research that considers presenteeism as a neutral behavior that has both positive and negative predictors and outcomes for individuals and organizations. This neutral perspective diverges from the traditional negative view of presenteeism and is aligned with the Health-Performance Framework of Presenteeism (HFPF) in which presenteeism is considered to be an adaptive behavior that aims to balance health limitations and performance demands. This proof-of-concept study aims to investigate the existence of different profiles of presentees based on their common health problems (mental and physical) and performance, and differences in attendance and job stressors among these subgroups. Latent profile analysis with 159 clerical employees and managers from the UK private sector supported the HPFP and revealed four profiles: those reporting a good health and high performance were labeled (who represented 19% of the sample), those with poor health and low performance were the (14%), those with relatively high performance but poor health were labeled (22%), and those with average scores on both dimensions were the (45%; a new profile based on this sample). There was no profile in the present sample that corresponded to , characterized by low performance but relatively good health. Although were comparable to in exposure to most job stressors, they reported poorer pay and benefits, and more health problems than the latter. reported the lowest number of days of presenteeism. No difference was found in absenteeism across profiles, highlighting difficulties in measuring presenteeism using a count-measure, since three profiles presented a similar number of days of presenteeism yet contrasted health-performance configurations. were systematically more exposed to job stressors compared to . The results support the HPFP proposition for different subgroups of presentees who are influenced by their work environment. The study takes a person-centered approach, disentangle presenteeism from the total count of presenteeism days, offering implications for management and intervention practice. Presenteeism can have a bright side and be functional in certain contexts when the appropriate resources are available.

摘要

越来越多的研究将出勤主义视为一种中性行为,它对个人和组织有着积极和消极的预测因素及结果。这种中性观点与传统上对出勤主义的负面看法不同,并且与出勤主义健康绩效框架(HFPF)一致,在该框架中,出勤主义被视为一种适应性行为,旨在平衡健康限制和绩效要求。这项概念验证研究旨在调查基于员工常见健康问题(心理和身体)及绩效的不同出勤主义类型的存在情况,以及这些亚组在出勤情况和工作压力源方面的差异。对来自英国私营部门的159名文职员工和管理人员进行的潜在类别分析支持了HFPF,并揭示了四种类型:报告健康状况良好且绩效高的被标记为(占样本的19%),健康状况差且绩效低的是(14%),绩效相对较高但健康状况差的被标记为(22%),在两个维度上得分均为中等的是(45%;基于该样本的一种新类型)。在当前样本中没有与相对应的类型,其特征是绩效低但健康状况相对较好。尽管在接触大多数工作压力源方面与相当,但他们报告的薪酬和福利较差,且健康问题比后者更多。报告的出勤主义天数最少。在各类型之间未发现旷工方面的差异,这凸显了使用计数测量法来衡量出勤主义的困难,因为有三种类型的出勤主义天数相似,但健康 - 绩效配置却不同。与相比,系统性地更多地暴露于工作压力源之下。结果支持了HFPF关于受工作环境影响的不同出勤主义亚组的主张。该研究采用以人为本的方法,将出勤主义与出勤主义天数的总数区分开来,为管理和干预实践提供了启示。当有适当资源时,出勤主义在某些情况下可能有积极的一面且发挥作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba79/9706183/1cba7f90e4ea/fpsyg-13-1029434-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验