Suppr超能文献

经皮神经电刺激叠加运动与大重量慢阻力训练治疗髌腱腱病同样有效。

NMES superimposed on movement is equally effective as heavy slow resistance training in patellar tendinopathy.

机构信息

Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome Foro Italico, Rome, Italy.

Villa Stuart Sport Clinic-FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2022 Dec 1;22(4):474-485.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of an 8-week training protocol, based on neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the quadriceps, which was superimposed onto voluntary exercise (NMES+), in comparison to a traditional heavy slow resistance training (HSRT), in individuals with patellar tendinopathy.

METHODS

Thirty-two physically active participants, aged: 33.6±10.2 years, were divided into two groups: NMES+ or HSRT. Maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of knee extensor and flexor muscles, power during a countermovement jump (CMJ), and VISA-p questionnaire scores were recorded at the start(T0), 2-weeks(T1), 4-weeks(T2), 6-weeks(T3), 8-weeks(T4) and 4-months post-training (T5). Knee pain and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded at each training session with a 0-10 scale.

RESULTS

Knee pain was significantly lower in NMES+ compared to HSRT during all training sessions. No significant between-group differences were found for VISA-p scores and forces recorded during MVICs at T0,T1,T2,T3,T4 and T5. A significant increase of VISA-p and peak forces during MVIC was recorded across-time in both groups. No significant between-group or across-time differences were found for RPE and CMJ parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

NMES+ and HSRT were equally effective in decreasing tendinopathy symptoms and increasing strength, with NMES+ having the advantage to be a pain-free resistance training modality.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较基于股四头肌神经肌肉电刺激的 8 周训练方案(NMES+)与传统的重阻力慢训练(HSRT)对髌腱病患者的疗效。

方法

32 名活跃的参与者,年龄:33.6±10.2 岁,被分为两组:NMES+或 HSRT。在开始(T0)、2 周(T1)、4 周(T2)、6 周(T3)、8 周(T4)和训练后 4 个月(T5)时记录膝关节伸肌和屈肌的最大等长收缩(MVIC)、反跳跳(CMJ)时的功率以及 VISA-p 问卷评分。在每次训练时,用 0-10 分制记录膝关节疼痛和感觉用力程度(RPE)。

结果

NMES+组在所有训练时的膝关节疼痛均明显低于 HSRT 组。在 T0、T1、T2、T3、T4 和 T5 时,MVIC 记录的 VISA-p 评分和力无组间差异。两组的 VISA-p 和 MVIC 峰值力均随时间显著增加。RPE 和 CMJ 无组间或随时间的差异。

结论

NMES+和 HSRT 均可有效减轻腱病症状和增加力量,NMES+的优势在于它是一种无痛的抗阻训练方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e6/9716305/712e65ebda18/JMNI-22-474-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验