• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语境动态在老化谱中的词汇编码中:一项模拟研究。

Contextual dynamics in lexical encoding across the ageing spectrum: A simulation study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Sep;76(9):2164-2182. doi: 10.1177/17470218221145685. Epub 2022 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1177/17470218221145685
PMID:36458499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10466941/
Abstract

The field of psycholinguistics has recently questioned the primacy of word frequency (WF) in influencing word recognition and production, instead focusing on the importance of a word's contextual diversity (CD). WF is operationalised by counting the number of occurrences of a word in a corpus, while a word's CD is a count of the number of contexts that a word occurs in, with repetitions within a context being ignored. Numerous studies have converged on the conclusion that CD is a better predictor of word recognition latency and accuracy than frequency. These findings support a cognitive mechanism based on the principle of likely need over the principle of repetition in lexical organisation. In the current study, we trained the semantic distinctiveness model on communication patterns in social media platforms consisting of over 55-billion-word tokens and examined the ability of theoretically distinct models to explain word recognition latency and accuracy data from over 1 million participants from the Mandera et al. English Crowdsourding Project norms, consisting of approximately 59,000 words across six age bands ranging from ages 10 to 60 years. There was a clear quantitative trend across the age bands, where there is a shift from a social environment-based attention mechanism in the "younger" models, to a clear dominance for a discourse-based attention mechanism as models "aged." This pattern suggests that there is a dynamical interaction between the cognitive mechanisms of lexical organisation and environmental information that emerges across ageing.

摘要

心理语言学领域最近对影响词汇识别和生成的词频(WF)首要性提出了质疑,而是转而关注词汇的语境多样性(CD)的重要性。WF 通过计算词汇在语料库中的出现次数来操作,而词汇的 CD 是词汇在上下文中出现的次数的计数,上下文内的重复不计。许多研究都得出了这样的结论:CD 是词汇识别潜伏期和准确性的更好预测指标,而不是频率。这些发现支持了一种认知机制,该机制基于词汇组织中可能需要的原则,而不是重复的原则。在本研究中,我们使用由超过 550 亿个词元组成的社交媒体平台上的交流模式对语义区分模型进行了训练,并研究了理论上不同的模型解释来自 Mandera 等人的英语众包规范的 100 多万名参与者的词汇识别潜伏期和准确性数据的能力。该规范包含了六个年龄组的大约 59000 个单词,年龄从 10 岁到 60 岁不等。在年龄组之间存在明显的定量趋势,其中“年轻”模型中的基于社会环境的注意力机制发生了转变,而随着模型的“老化”,基于语篇的注意力机制则明显占主导地位。这种模式表明,在衰老过程中,词汇组织和环境信息的认知机制之间存在动态交互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/a8966eb7fec5/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/aabdf87942d5/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/4af08f63f008/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/0d99f8cb44b6/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/2cf26c44b3e7/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/439083b80fac/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/70d77252c364/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/dca04a5cd266/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/ac8cd6b88da6/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/303dde2ceeed/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/f922433b9c2e/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/bbe9576e25f0/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/a8966eb7fec5/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/aabdf87942d5/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/4af08f63f008/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/0d99f8cb44b6/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/2cf26c44b3e7/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/439083b80fac/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/70d77252c364/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/dca04a5cd266/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/ac8cd6b88da6/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/303dde2ceeed/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/f922433b9c2e/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/bbe9576e25f0/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e555/10466941/a8966eb7fec5/10.1177_17470218221145685-fig12.jpg

相似文献

1
Contextual dynamics in lexical encoding across the ageing spectrum: A simulation study.语境动态在老化谱中的词汇编码中:一项模拟研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Sep;76(9):2164-2182. doi: 10.1177/17470218221145685. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
2
The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization.语义多样性在词汇组织中的作用。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Jun;66(2):115-24. doi: 10.1037/a0026727.
3
Disentangling contextual diversity: Communicative need as a lexical organizer.语境多样性的剖析:交际需求作为词汇组织工具。
Psychol Rev. 2021 Apr;128(3):525-557. doi: 10.1037/rev0000265. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
4
Determining the importance of frequency and contextual diversity in the lexical organization of multiword expressions.确定频率和语境多样性在多词表达式词汇组织中的重要性。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Jun;76(2):87-98. doi: 10.1037/cep0000271. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
5
There are many ways to be rich: effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition.致富的方式有很多种:语义丰富度的三种度量对视觉单词识别的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):161-7. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.161.
6
It's all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing.一切都在于呈现方式:语境效价、唤醒水平和具体性对视觉单词加工的影响。
Cognition. 2016 Nov;156:135-146. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
7
Contributions of semantic and contextual diversity to the word frequency effect in L2 lexical access.语义和语境多样性对二语词汇提取中词频效应的贡献。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2020 Mar;74(1):25-34. doi: 10.1037/cep0000189. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
8
Comparing word frequency, semantic diversity, and semantic distinctiveness in lexical organization.比较词汇组织中的词频、语义多样性和语义独特性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Jun;152(6):1814-1823. doi: 10.1037/xge0001407.
9
Second-language word recognition in noise: Interdependent neuromodulatory effects of semantic context and crosslinguistic interactions driven by word form similarity.第二语言噪声中的单词识别:语义语境和跨语言相互作用的神经调节效应,受单词形式相似性驱动。
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 15;237:118168. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118168. Epub 2021 May 15.
10
Distributional social semantics: Inferring word meanings from communication patterns.分布社会语义学:从交流模式中推断词义。
Cogn Psychol. 2021 Dec;131:101441. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101441. Epub 2021 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Environment Context Variability and Incidental Word Learning: A Virtual Reality Study.环境上下文变异性与偶发词汇学习:一项虚拟现实研究。
Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 8;12(11):1516. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111516.

本文引用的文献

1
Determining the importance of frequency and contextual diversity in the lexical organization of multiword expressions.确定频率和语境多样性在多词表达式词汇组织中的重要性。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Jun;76(2):87-98. doi: 10.1037/cep0000271. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
2
Accounting for item-level variance in recognition memory: Comparing word frequency and contextual diversity.在识别记忆中考虑项目水平的差异:比较词频和语境多样性。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jul;50(5):1013-1032. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01249-z. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
3
Contextual diversity favors the learning of new words in children regardless of their comprehension skills.
语境多样性有利于儿童学习新单词,而与他们的理解能力无关。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Feb;214:105312. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105312. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
4
Distributional social semantics: Inferring word meanings from communication patterns.分布社会语义学:从交流模式中推断词义。
Cogn Psychol. 2021 Dec;131:101441. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101441. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
5
Does narrator variability facilitate incidental word learning in the classroom?叙述者的变异性是否有助于课堂上的偶然词汇学习?
Mem Cognit. 2022 Feb;50(2):278-295. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01228-4. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
6
Disentangling contextual diversity: Communicative need as a lexical organizer.语境多样性的剖析:交际需求作为词汇组织工具。
Psychol Rev. 2021 Apr;128(3):525-557. doi: 10.1037/rev0000265. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
7
Semantic memory: A review of methods, models, and current challenges.语义记忆:方法、模型及当前挑战综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Feb;28(1):40-80. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01792-x.
8
The influence of item-level contextual history on lexical and semantic judgments by children and adults.项目水平语境历史对儿童和成人词汇和语义判断的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Dec;46(12):2367-2383. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000795. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
9
Estimating the prevalence and diversity of words in written language.估计书面语言中的单词的流行度和多样性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Jun;73(6):841-855. doi: 10.1177/1747021819897560. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
10
Semantic diversity in paired-associate learning: Further evidence for the information accumulation perspective of cognitive aging.在成对联想学习中的语义多样性:认知老化的信息累加观的进一步证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Feb;27(1):114-121. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01691-w.