Department of Experimental Otology, Hannover Medical School, Nife Stadtfelddamm 34, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Cluster of Excellence "Hearing 4 All" (DFG Exc. 2177), Hannover, Germany.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2023 Feb;24(1):31-46. doi: 10.1007/s10162-022-00878-8. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
One severe side effect of the use of cochlear implants (CI) is coincidental facial nerve stimulation (FNS). Clinical methods to alleviate FNS range from the reprogramming of processor settings to revision surgery. We systematically assessed different changes in CI stimulation modes that have been discussed in the literature as "rescue factors" from FNS: electrode configuration (broad to focused), pulse shape (symmetric biphasic to pseudo-monophasic), and pulse polarity (cathodic to anodic). An FNS was assessed, based on electrophysiological thresholds, in 204 electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) input/output functions recorded from 33 ears of 26 guinea pigs. The stimulation level difference between auditory nerve eCAP threshold and FNS threshold was expressed as the eCAP-to-FNS offset. Coincidental FNS occurred in all animals and in 45% of all recordings. A change from monopolar to focused (bipolar, tripolar) configurations minimized FNS. The Euclidean distance between the CI contacts and the facial nerve explained no more than 33% of the variance in FNS thresholds. For both the FNS threshold and the eCAP-to-FNS offset, the change from cathodic to anodic pulse polarity significantly reduced FNS and permitted a gain of 14-71% of the dynamic range of the eCAP response. This "anodic rescue effect" was stronger for pseudo-monophasic pulses as compared to the symmetric biphasic pulse shape. These results provide possible mechanisms underlying recent clinical interventions to alleviate FNS. The "anodic-rescue effect" may offer a non-invasive therapeutic option for FNS in human CI users that should be tested clinically, preferably in combination with current-focusing methods.
人工耳蜗植入(CI)使用的一个严重副作用是偶然面神经刺激(FNS)。减轻 FNS 的临床方法范围从处理器设置的重新编程到修正手术。我们系统地评估了文献中讨论的作为 FNS“救援因素”的不同 CI 刺激模式变化:电极配置(宽到聚焦)、脉冲形状(对称双相到伪单相)和脉冲极性(阴极到阳极)。根据电生理阈值,在从 26 只豚鼠的 33 只耳朵记录的 204 个电诱发复合动作电位(eCAP)输入/输出功能中评估了 FNS。听觉神经 eCAP 阈值和 FNS 阈值之间的刺激水平差表示为 eCAP 到 FNS 偏移。所有动物和 45%的所有记录中都发生了偶然的 FNS。从单极到聚焦(双极、三极)配置的变化最小化了 FNS。CI 触点和面神经之间的欧几里得距离解释了 FNS 阈值变化的不超过 33%。对于 FNS 阈值和 eCAP 到 FNS 偏移,从阴极到阳极脉冲极性的变化显著降低了 FNS,并允许 eCAP 响应动态范围增加 14-71%。与对称双相脉冲形状相比,伪单相脉冲的“阳极救援效应”更强。这些结果为最近减轻 FNS 的临床干预提供了可能的机制。“阳极救援效应”可能为 CI 使用者的 FNS 提供一种非侵入性的治疗选择,应在临床上进行测试,最好与当前聚焦方法结合使用。