Suppr超能文献

Congenital midline upper lip sinuses with intracranial extension - A variant of nasal dermoid? An embryology-based concept.

作者信息

Kotowski Michal, Szydlowski Jaroslaw

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 27/33 Szpitalna Street, 60-572, Poznan, Poland.

Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 27/33 Szpitalna Street, 60-572, Poznan, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jan;164:111394. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111394. Epub 2022 Nov 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to present the comparative analysis of midline congenital upper lip sinuses (MCULS) and nasal dermoids (NDs). The clinical similarity of congenital midline pathologies of the midface was interesting subject for further studies. Therefore, histopathological, and embryological background were also analyzed to verify a hypothesis that NDs and MCULSs are the different variants of the same entity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study group included 27 surgically treated pediatric cases with the congenital midline sinus of the nose (n = 25) or upper lip (n = 2). Seven children presented intraoperatively confirmed intracranial extension of the abnormality, 6 in NDs group and 1 in MCULS group. Apart from clinical characteristics also histopathological results were compared in both groups. An analysis of the literature concerning the proposed theories of origin of NDs as well as the current classification systems of MCULSs and NDs were conducted.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed that MCULSs present the same clinical characteristics as NDs. No differences were noticed in the histopathological results. The embryological theories presented so far are insufficient to convincingly explain the precise process of origin of abnormalities such as ND and MCULS. Nevertheless, the developmental embryological processes of the midface shed a new light on the common origin of NDs and MCULSs. The proposal of an update of the existing classification of midline congenital midface sinuses was presented.

CONCLUSIONS

The comparative analysis of clinical, histopathological, and embryological characteristics confirms that NDs and MCULSs are different forms of the same entity. Embryological implications result in the possibility of intracranial extension in each case of MCULS. Therefore, CT and MR imaging which provide irreplaceable information are recommended for all patients with MCULS. The updated classification of midline congenital midface sinuses should be taken into consideration.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验