Kjærstad Hanne Lie, Søhol Kristine, Vinberg Maj, Kessing Lars Vedel, Miskowiak Kamilla Woznica
Copenhagen Affective Disorder research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023 Feb;67:4-21. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
Cognitive impairments are evident in remitted patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and their unaffected relatives (UR) compared to healthy controls (HC). However, the temporal course of cognition, and whether cognition is marked by neuroprogressive changes, remain unclear. In a large prospective study of newly diagnosed patients with BD, we assessed patients with BD (n = 266), UR (n = 105) and HC (n = 190) using an extensive cognitive battery of non-emotional and emotional cognition at baseline and 16-months follow-up. Cognitive change across groups was examined with linear mixed-model analyses. Results showed no evidence of trajectory differences between patients with BD, UR, and HC in neurocognition and emotional cognition (ps≥.10). Patients with BD showed stable impairments in global neurocognitive functioning over time, as well as within the domains of 'working memory and executive function' and 'attention and psychomotor speed', compared to HC. Patients who relapsed during the follow-up time were less successful at down-regulating emotions in positive social scenarios compared to HC. Unaffected relatives also displayed stable deficits in 'working memory and executive function' over time, with performance at intermediate levels between BD probands and HC. Finally, poorer neurocognition and positive emotion regulation were associated with more subsyndromal symptoms and functional impairments. In conclusion, we found no evidence of a neuroprogressive origin of cognitive impairments in the newly diagnosed BD or in their UR. Patients' and UR's impairments in working memory and executive function may reflect a stable cognitive trait-marker of familial risk. Difficulties with positive emotion regulation may be associated with illness progression in BD.
与健康对照者(HC)相比,双相情感障碍(BD)缓解期患者及其未患病亲属(UR)存在明显的认知障碍。然而,认知的时间进程以及认知是否以神经进行性变化为特征仍不清楚。在一项对新诊断的BD患者的大型前瞻性研究中,我们在基线和16个月随访时,使用一套广泛的非情感和情感认知测试电池,对BD患者(n = 266)、UR(n = 105)和HC(n = 190)进行了评估。通过线性混合模型分析检验了各组之间的认知变化。结果显示,BD患者、UR和HC在神经认知和情感认知方面没有轨迹差异的证据(p≥0.10)。与HC相比,BD患者在整体神经认知功能方面随时间保持稳定的损害,在“工作记忆和执行功能”以及“注意力和心理运动速度”领域也是如此。在随访期间复发的患者,与HC相比,在积极社交场景中下调情绪的能力较差。未患病亲属在“工作记忆和执行功能”方面也随时间显示出稳定的缺陷,表现处于BD先证者和HC之间的中等水平。最后,较差的神经认知和积极情绪调节与更多的亚综合征症状和功能损害相关。总之,我们没有发现新诊断的BD患者或其UR的认知障碍有神经进行性起源的证据。患者和UR在工作记忆和执行功能方面的损害可能反映了家族风险的稳定认知特质标记。积极情绪调节困难可能与BD的疾病进展有关。