Bipolar Disorder Program (PROMAN), Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Frederiksberg Hospital, Denmark.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023 Jun;71:9-24. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
Although cross-sectional studies show heterogeneity in emotional cognition in bipolar disorder (BD), the temporal course within subgroups is unclear. In this prospective, longitudinal study we assessed the trajectories of emotional cognition subgroups within a 16-month follow-up period in recently diagnosed BD patients compared to healthy controls (HC). Recently diagnosed BD patients and HC underwent comprehensive emotional and non-emotional testing at baseline and again at follow-up. We employed hierarchical cluster analysis at baseline to identify homogenous emotional cognition subgroups of patients, and changes across the subgroups of BD and HC were assessed with linear mixed-model analyses. We found two emotional cognition subgroups: subgroup 1 (65%, n = 179), showing heightened negative emotional reactivity in neutral and negative social scenarios and faster recognition of emotional facial expressions than HC (ps<0.001, n = 190), and subgroup 2 (35%, n = 96) showing blunted reactivity in positive social scenarios, impaired emotion regulation, poorer recognition of positive and slower recognition of all facial expressions than HC (ps≤.03). Subgroup 1 exhibited normalization of the initial emotional cognition abnormalities in follow-up. In contrast, subgroup 2 showed a lack of improvement in reactivity positively-valenced emotional information. Patients in subgroup 2 presented more and longer mixed episodes during the follow-up time and were more often prescribed lithium. One third of patients display blunted emotional reactivity, impaired emotion regulation abilities and facial expression recognition difficulties also show persistent impairments and poorer course of illness. This subgroup may indicate a need for earlier and more targeted therapeutic interventions.
尽管横断面研究显示双相情感障碍(BD)患者在情绪认知方面存在异质性,但亚组内的时间进程尚不清楚。在这项前瞻性、纵向研究中,我们评估了在 16 个月的随访期内,新诊断的 BD 患者与健康对照组(HC)内情绪认知亚组的轨迹。新诊断的 BD 患者和 HC 在基线时和随访时接受了全面的情绪和非情绪测试。我们在基线时采用分层聚类分析来识别患者情绪认知的同质亚组,并采用线性混合模型分析评估 BD 和 HC 亚组的变化。我们发现了两个情绪认知亚组:亚组 1(65%,n=179),在中性和负面社交情景中表现出更高的负性情绪反应性,并且比 HC 更快地识别情绪面部表情(p<0.001,n=190),以及亚组 2(35%,n=96),在积极的社交情景中表现出反应迟钝,情绪调节受损,对积极情绪的识别较差,对所有面部表情的识别较慢,均比 HC 差(p≤.03)。亚组 1在随访中表现出初始情绪认知异常的正常化。相比之下,亚组 2在积极情绪信息的反应性方面缺乏改善。亚组 2的患者在随访期间出现更多和更长时间的混合发作,并且更常被开锂盐治疗。三分之一的患者表现出情绪反应迟钝、情绪调节能力受损以及面部表情识别困难,且仍存在持续的认知障碍和较差的疾病进程。该亚组可能表明需要更早和更有针对性的治疗干预。