Kjærstad Hanne Lie, Haldorsen Thea, Vinberg Maj, Kessing Lars Vedel, Miskowiak Kamilla Woznica
Copenhagen Affective Disorder research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Affect Disord. 2023 Mar 1;324:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.061. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with impairments in both emotional and non-emotional cognition. Recently, cognitive impairments have attracted increasing research interest as markers of prognosis and possible treatment targets in patients with BD. However, there is a paucity of studies investigating cognitive predictors of prognosis in BD.
We assessed 148 recently diagnosed, symptomatically stable patients with BD with a battery of emotional and non-emotional cognitive tests and followed them up over 16 months as part of an ongoing cohort study. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the associations between cognitive performance at baseline and the recurrence and duration of (hypo)manic and depressive episodes, respectively, with adjustment for age, sex, subsyndromal symptoms and time between assessments.
Poorer recognition of negative facial expressions and more negative emotions in neutral daily life scenarios were associated with greater frequency (ps ≤ .04) and longer duration (ps ≤ .03) of subsequent (hypo)manic episodes over the 16-month follow-up period. In addition, poorer global cognition, attention and psychomotor speed, and verbal fluency were associated with more (hypo)manic episodes (ps ≤ .04). Finally, more difficulty down-regulating emotion in negative social scenarios was associated with depressive relapse (p = .007). It was a limitation that patients had a delayed diagnosis of seven years from their first mood episode despite being recently diagnosed.
Trait-related cognitive impairments influence the early course in recently diagnosed patients with BD, particularly (hypo)manic relapse. Early prophylactic strategies targeting cognitive impairments may increase resilience and the course of illness in recently diagnosed patients with BD.
双相情感障碍(BD)与情绪和非情绪认知障碍有关。最近,认知障碍作为BD患者预后的标志物和可能的治疗靶点,已引起越来越多的研究关注。然而,关于BD预后的认知预测因素的研究却很少。
我们使用一系列情绪和非情绪认知测试对148例近期确诊、症状稳定的BD患者进行了评估,并作为一项正在进行的队列研究的一部分,对他们进行了16个月的随访。进行了多元线性回归分析,以检验基线认知表现与(轻)躁狂和抑郁发作的复发及持续时间之间的关联,并对年龄、性别、亚综合征症状和评估间隔时间进行了调整。
在16个月的随访期内,对负面面部表情的识别能力较差以及在中性日常生活场景中负面情绪较多,与随后(轻)躁狂发作的频率更高(p值≤0.04)和持续时间更长(p值≤0.03)相关。此外,整体认知、注意力、心理运动速度和语言流畅性较差与更多的(轻)躁狂发作相关(p值≤0.04)。最后,在负面社交场景中更难下调情绪与抑郁复发相关(p = 0.007)。尽管患者最近被诊断出患有BD,但从首次情绪发作起有7年的延迟诊断,这是一个局限性。
与特质相关的认知障碍影响近期确诊的BD患者的早期病程,尤其是(轻)躁狂复发。针对认知障碍的早期预防策略可能会提高近期确诊的BD患者的恢复力和病程。