Suppr超能文献

无烟政策对户外体育俱乐部吸烟行为的影响:一项定性研究。

The impact of smoke-free policies on smoking at outdoor sports clubs: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Public Health. 2023 Jan;214:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.10.020. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Smoking may still occur at sports clubs with an outdoor smoke-free policy (SFP). This study aims to map the occurrence of smoking at various sports clubs in the Netherlands and to understand why smoking occurs at some clubs but not at others.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a qualitative design in the form of semistructured interviews.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews (n = 34) were held online with smoking and non-smoking members of 17 Dutch outdoor sports clubs (in field hockey, korfball, football, and tennis) with an outdoor SFP. Data were analyzed using content analysis.

RESULTS

We identified four situations where smoking still occurred: (1) directly at the entrance, (2) at some distance from the entrance, (3) in particular places on the premises, and (4) in various places or on occasions when alcohol is consumed. Smoking directly at the entrance was most often perceived as a bothersome situation that was difficult to avoid. The occurrence of these situations differed per sports club depending on the scope of the SFP (the comprehensiveness of the SFP and the presence or absence of a smoking area) and factors influencing policy compliance (physical characteristics of the sports club's premises, the presence or absence of children, and several enforcement difficulties).

CONCLUSION

In some sports clubs, smoking remained common on the premises despite an outdoor SFP. Exposure to second-hand smoke might be reduced by formulating a comprehensive SFP, improving policy compliance also in situations where children are absent, and organizing the enforcement of the policy.

摘要

目的

即使在实行室外无烟政策(SFP)的运动俱乐部,吸烟仍可能发生。本研究旨在绘制荷兰各运动俱乐部吸烟情况的地图,并了解为何有些俱乐部存在吸烟现象,而有些则没有。

研究设计

这是一项采用半结构化访谈形式的定性设计。

方法

对 17 个荷兰室外运动俱乐部(曲棍球、手球、足球和网球)的吸烟和非吸烟成员(n=34)进行了在线半结构化访谈,这些俱乐部都实行室外 SFP。采用内容分析法分析数据。

结果

我们发现吸烟仍在四种情况下发生:(1)直接在入口处,(2)在入口处附近,(3)在场地内特定位置,以及(4)在饮酒时的不同场所或场合。直接在入口处吸烟最常被认为是一种令人困扰且难以避免的情况。这些情况的发生因运动俱乐部而异,取决于 SFP 的范围(SFP 的全面性以及是否有吸烟区)和影响政策合规的因素(运动俱乐部场地的物理特征、是否有儿童以及若干执行困难)。

结论

尽管实行了室外 SFP,但在一些运动俱乐部内,场内吸烟仍然普遍。通过制定全面的 SFP、提高在没有儿童时的政策合规性以及组织政策执行,可以减少二手烟暴露。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验