Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jun;92:103129. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103129. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
Outdoor smoke-free policies (SFPs) at sports clubs have significant potential to reduce adolescent smoking. However, the realization of this potential may be strongly dependent on how these policies are implemented in practice. The aim of this study is to explore the perceptions of key stakeholders at different sports clubs in the Netherlands concerning how outdoor SFPs are implemented in practice and which determinants influence implementation.
Semi-structured interviews were held with 46 key stakeholders at eight Dutch sports clubs (i.e., field hockey, soccer, tennis, korfball) with an outdoor SFP. A thematic approach was used for the analysis of the transcripts.
Overall, respondents perceived the implementation of an outdoor SFP at sports clubs as feasible. The SFP is often enforced, people who smoke react positively when they are approached, the SFP has led to less (visible) smoking at the venue, and a nonsmoking norm is reinforced. However, we identified three 'critical situations' in which implementation is less than optimal: 1) when children are not present at the sports club, 2) when alcohol is involved, and 3) when people who smoke relocate to the entrance of the sports club. Several determinants influenced implementation in those critical situations: 1) determinants related to individual smokers and club members (i.e., support, communication towards people who smoke), 2) determinants related to the SFP itself (i.e., clarity of the policy), 3) determinants related to the sports club (i.e., communication of the policy, characteristics of the sports club), and 4) determinants related to the wider community (i.e., change of social norm with regard to smoking, support from local and national organizations).
Implementation of an outdoor SFP at sports clubs is feasible because there is a high level of support and experiences are mainly positive. Nevertheless, some situations present challenges to compliance and enforcement. We identified a number of determinants that may facilitate implementation of an outdoor SFP at sports clubs.
体育俱乐部的室外无烟政策(SFPs)具有显著降低青少年吸烟的潜力。然而,这种潜力的实现可能强烈依赖于这些政策在实践中的实施方式。本研究的目的是探索荷兰不同体育俱乐部的利益相关者对室外 SFPs 实际实施情况的看法,以及影响实施的决定因素。
对 8 个荷兰体育俱乐部(曲棍球、足球、网球、手球)的 46 名关键利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,这些俱乐部均实施了室外 SFP。采用主题分析方法对转录本进行分析。
总体而言,受访者认为在体育俱乐部实施室外 SFP 是可行的。该 SFP 通常得到执行,当吸烟者被劝阻时,他们会做出积极的反应,该 SFP 已经减少了场馆内的(可见)吸烟,并且强化了非吸烟规范。然而,我们发现了三个“关键情况”,在这些情况下实施效果不如理想:1)当孩子不在体育俱乐部时,2)当涉及酒精时,3)当吸烟者转移到体育俱乐部入口时。一些决定因素影响了这些关键情况下的实施:1)与个体吸烟者和俱乐部成员相关的决定因素(例如,对吸烟者的支持、沟通),2)与 SFP 本身相关的决定因素(例如,政策的清晰度),3)与体育俱乐部相关的决定因素(例如,政策的沟通、体育俱乐部的特点),4)与更广泛的社区相关的决定因素(例如,吸烟的社会规范的改变、来自地方和国家组织的支持)。
在体育俱乐部实施室外 SFP 是可行的,因为支持度高,且经验主要是积极的。然而,某些情况下仍然存在合规和执行的挑战。我们确定了一些可能有助于在体育俱乐部实施室外 SFP 的决定因素。