Suppr超能文献

荷兰有禁烟政策和无禁烟政策的足球俱乐部中的吸烟情况:一项观察性研究。

Smoking at football clubs with and without smoke-free policies in the Netherlands: an observational study.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Public Health. 2024 Nov;236:354-360. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.07.031. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Research shows that smoking persists in sports clubs with smoke-free policies (SFPs). It is unknown to what extent smoking occurs at such clubs and how much that may differ from clubs without SFPs. This study aimed to determine whether and to what extent smoking differs at Dutch football clubs with and without SFPs.

STUDY DESIGN

This cross-sectional study used a purposive sampling method to compare smoking indicators at 117 Dutch football clubs, with 49 clubs (41.8%) having an SFP.

METHODS

Using a standardised checklist, three smoking indicators were observed (number of people smoking, smoking facilities, and cigarette butts) and combined in a total smoking score (scale 0-9). Multi-level linear regression analysis was used to analyse the association between club SFP, local tobacco control policies (TCPs), and smoking indicators.

RESULTS

Significantly fewer smoking facilities were present at clubs with an SFP (-2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.61; -1.09), but no significant associations were found between SFP and the number of people smoking and cigarette butts. The total smoking score was 1.74 points lower for clubs with an SFP (95% CI: -2.53; -0.96) and 1.85 points lower for clubs in municipalities with strong local TCPs (95% CI: -2.98; -0.72). Strong local TCPs were associated with significantly fewer people smoking at clubs (-1.79, 95% CI: -3.41; -0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

SFPs at sports clubs succeed in limiting the number of smoking facilities but do not show differences in terms of smoking rates or smoking-related litter when compared to clubs without SFPs. Our results highlight the need for enhancing implementation of comprehensive SFPs, including clear guidelines for compliance and enforcement.

摘要

目的

研究表明,在实施无烟政策(SFP)的体育俱乐部中,吸烟现象仍然存在。目前尚不清楚此类俱乐部中吸烟的程度,以及与没有 SFP 的俱乐部相比有何不同。本研究旨在确定荷兰足球俱乐部是否以及在何种程度上存在 SFP 和没有 SFP 之间的吸烟差异。

研究设计

本横断面研究采用了目的抽样法,比较了 117 家荷兰足球俱乐部的 3 项吸烟指标(吸烟人数、吸烟设施和烟蒂),并将其综合为一个总吸烟评分(0-9 分制)。采用多水平线性回归分析方法,分析了俱乐部 SFP、当地烟草控制政策(TCP)与吸烟指标之间的关联。

结果

实施 SFP 的俱乐部中吸烟设施数量明显减少(-2.35,95%置信区间[CI]:-3.61;-1.09),但 SFP 与吸烟人数和烟蒂数量之间无显著关联。实施 SFP 的俱乐部总吸烟评分低 1.74 分(95%CI:-2.53;-0.96),当地 TCP 较强的俱乐部总吸烟评分低 1.85 分(95%CI:-2.98;-0.72)。当地 TCP 较强与俱乐部吸烟人数减少显著相关(-1.79,95%CI:-3.41;-0.17)。

结论

体育俱乐部实施 SFP 成功地限制了吸烟设施的数量,但与没有 SFP 的俱乐部相比,在吸烟率或与吸烟相关的垃圾方面没有差异。我们的研究结果强调需要加强全面实施 SFP,包括明确的合规和执行指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验