Liu Wenjie, Yang Lichun, Liu Jiewei
Cataract Department, Shanxi Eye Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, People's Republic of China.
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Nov 28;15:8417-8425. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S382774. eCollection 2022.
This study aimed to evaluate the changes in posterior corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery and provide a theoretical basis to accurately evaluate the total corneal astigmatism (TA) to be corrected before toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
Sixty-two patients (89 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification combined with toric IOL implantation (AcrySof IQ Toric SN6AT2-T9) at Shanxi Eye Hospital between January 2017 and September 2018 were enrolled. Surgically induced astigmatism of the posterior cornea (SIAPA) was analysed using vector analysis during pentacam examination.
The vector variances of keratometric astigmatism (KA), TA, and posterior corneal astigmatism (PA) preoperatively and postoperatively in the "with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism" group and "overall patient" group were statistically significant ( < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed between surgically induced KA (SIAKA) and surgically induced astigmatism of the total cornea (SIATA) for all patients, including those with WTR astigmatism. For all patients, SIAKA was less than SIATA by 0.05 ± 0.21 D, and for patients with WTR astigmatism, SIAKA was less than SIATA by 0.09 ± 0.22 D. For patients in the "against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism" group, there were no statistically significant differences between SIAKA and SIATA, although SIAKA was greater than SIATA by 0.03 ± 0.18 D. When PA ≤0.4 D or KA ≤2.0 D, SIAPA can be ignored. However, when PA >0.4 D or KA >2.0 D, ignoring SIAPA caused by cataract surgery incision will cause SIAKA in patients with WTR astigmatism to underestimate SIATA, while SIAKA in patients with ATR astigmatism will cause an overestimation of SIATA.
SIA on the posterior corneal astigmatism may have a significant role on more precise planning of toric IOL implantation, especially in cases with higher preoperative anterior or posterior corneal astigmatism.
本研究旨在评估白内障手术后角膜后表面散光的变化,并为准确评估在植入散光人工晶状体(IOL)前需矫正的总角膜散光(TA)提供理论依据。
纳入2017年1月至2018年9月期间在山西省眼科医院接受超声乳化联合散光IOL植入术(AcrySof IQ Toric SN6AT2-T9)的62例患者(89只眼)。在Pentacam检查期间使用矢量分析来分析手术诱导的角膜后表面散光(SIAPA)。
“顺规散光(WTR)”组和“总体患者”组术前和术后角膜曲率性散光(KA)、TA和角膜后表面散光(PA)的矢量方差具有统计学意义(<0.05)。在所有患者中,包括那些有WTR散光的患者,手术诱导的KA(SIAKA)和手术诱导的总角膜散光(SIATA)之间观察到统计学上的显著差异。对于所有患者,SIAKA比SIATA小0.05±0.21 D,对于有WTR散光的患者,SIAKA比SIATA小0.09±0.22 D。对于“逆规散光(ATR)”组患者,SIAKA和SIATA之间无统计学显著差异,尽管SIAKA比SIATA大0.03±0.18 D。当PA≤0.4 D或KA≤2.0 D时,SIAPA可忽略不计。然而,当PA>0.4 D或KA>2.0 D时,忽略白内障手术切口引起的SIAPA将导致WTR散光患者的SIAKA低估SIATA,而ATR散光患者的SIAKA将导致高估SIATA。
角膜后表面散光上的手术诱导散光(SIA)可能对散光IOL植入的更精确规划具有重要作用,尤其是在术前角膜前表面或后表面散光较高的情况下。