Jackson Amy, Green Martin J, Kaler Jasmeet
Ruminant Population Health, The School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Nov 17;9:995240. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.995240. eCollection 2022.
Divergence in opinion over how farm animals should be cared for is creating a disconnect between livestock farming and the public that risks a loss of "social license" to farm. One proposed solution for the dairy farming community is to engage more constructively with the public to develop a shared vision of the industry's future; however, farmers and veterinarians remain reluctant to validate public opinions on farm animal care, in particular, often viewing them as naïve or impractical. Understanding the interpretive frames through which people make sense of dairy farming could help the dairy farming community engage more constructively with public opinion, thereby reducing conflict and providing opportunities to change communication or practice. Hence, frame analysis was conducted on transcripts of 60 face-to-face interviews with members of the UK public, first defining frames using reflexive thematic analysis, then considering the effect of these frames on those holding them. The results showed that dairy farming was mainly characterized by two entities: the cow and the farmer. Three frames were developed for the cow: she was perceived as i) enduring, which induced a sense of moral responsibility for her well-being among participants; ii) a fellow or companion, which led to feelings of a shared or parallel life with her; and iii) a force of nature, where the cow's connection with the natural world and "otherness" was appreciated, or even longed for. These connections were unexpectedly widespread within the sample, with many participants simultaneously holding two or even three frames. The farmer was seen through two frames: i) traditional; or ii) modernizing, but both frames had positive and negative narratives depending on the perceived care of the cow, causing confusion or even conflict about the care the farmer actually delivered. These findings provide new insights into the interpretive lenses through which the public makes sense of the dairy cow and her care, not least the bond the public themselves feel with the animal. They offer fresh opportunities for the dairy industry to improve engagement through more reflexive communication or modification of farming practices to better fit societal expectations about dairy cow welfare.
在如何照料农场动物的问题上,意见分歧正在造成畜牧业与公众之间的脱节,这有可能导致失去从事养殖的“社会许可”。针对奶牛养殖社区提出的一个解决方案是,更积极地与公众互动,以形成对该行业未来的共同愿景;然而,农民和兽医仍然不愿认可公众对农场动物照料的看法,尤其常常认为这些看法天真或不切实际。了解人们理解奶牛养殖所采用的解释框架,有助于奶牛养殖社区更积极地与公众意见互动,从而减少冲突,并提供改变沟通方式或养殖实践的机会。因此,对与英国公众成员进行的60次面对面访谈的文字记录进行了框架分析,首先通过反思性主题分析来定义框架,然后考虑这些框架对持有它们的人的影响。结果表明,奶牛养殖主要由两个实体来表征:奶牛和农民。为奶牛形成了三个框架:她被视为i)坚韧的,这在参与者中引发了对其福祉的道德责任感;ii)伙伴或同伴,这导致了与她共享或平行生活的感觉;iii)一种自然力量,在这种框架下,奶牛与自然世界的联系以及“独特性”得到赞赏,甚至令人向往。这些联系在样本中出人意料地普遍,许多参与者同时持有两个甚至三个框架。农民则通过两个框架来看待:i)传统的;或ii)现代化的,但这两个框架根据对奶牛的照料情况都有积极和消极的叙述,这导致了对农民实际提供的照料产生困惑甚至冲突。这些发现为公众理解奶牛及其照料所采用的解释视角提供了新的见解,尤其是公众自身与动物之间的联系。它们为乳制品行业提供了新的机会,通过更具反思性的沟通或调整养殖实践,以更好地符合社会对奶牛福利的期望,从而改善互动。