Sara Yeatman (
James M. Flynn, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Dec;41(12):1754-1762. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00066.
Public subsidies for contraception are often justified by assertions regarding their benefits for women's lives, yet there is limited contemporary evidence supporting these assertions. Beginning in 2009 the Colorado Family Planning Initiative abruptly expanded access to the full range of contraceptive methods through Colorado's Title X family planning clinics. Using eleven years of American Community Survey data linked to data from two decennial censuses, we assessed whether exposure to the program led to improvements in college completion among women. Exposure to the Colorado Family Planning Initiative at high school ages was associated with a population-level increase of 1.8-3.5 percentage points in women's on-time bachelor's degree attainment, which represents a 6-12 percent increase in women obtaining their degrees compared with earlier cohorts. Federal and state policies restricting or expanding access to the full range of contraceptive methods can affect women's attainment of higher education in addition to their reproductive health.
公共避孕补贴通常以其对女性生活的益处为依据进行辩护,但目前很少有证据支持这些主张。自 2009 年以来,科罗拉多计划生育倡议突然扩大了科罗拉多计划生育诊所获得全套避孕方法的机会。利用与两次十年人口普查数据相关联的十一年美国社区调查数据,我们评估了该计划的实施是否导致女性完成大学学业的情况有所改善。在高中时期接触科罗拉多计划生育倡议与女性按时获得学士学位的人数增加了 1.8-3.5 个百分点有关,这代表与之前的队列相比,有 6-12%的女性获得了学位。限制或扩大获得全套避孕方法的联邦和州政策除了影响女性的生殖健康外,还可能影响她们接受高等教育的机会。