Department of Neurology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Dec 6;46(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s10143-022-01913-1.
Cerebral vasospasm is a life-threatening complication following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). While digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the current gold standard for detection, the diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and transcranial Doppler (TCD) remains controversial. We aimed to summarize the available evidence and provide recommendations for their use based on GRADE criteria. A literature search was conducted for studies comparing CTA or TCD to DSA for adults ≥ 18 years with aSAH for radiographic vasospasm detection. The DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was used to pool sensitivity and specificity and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) and derive positive and negative pooled likelihood ratios (LR + /LR -). Out of 2070 studies, seven studies (1646 arterial segments) met inclusion criteria and were meta-analyzed. Compared to the gold standard (DSA), CTA had a pooled sensitivity of 82% (95%CI, 68-91%) and a specificity of 97% (95%CI, 93-98%), while TCD had lower sensitivity 38% (95%CI, 19-62%) and specificity of 91% (95%CI, 87-94%). Only the LR + for CTA (27.3) reached clinical significance to rule in diagnosis. LR - for CTA (0.19) and TCD (0.68) approached clinical significance (< 0.1) to rule out diagnosis. CTA showed higher LR + and lower LR - than TCD for diagnosing radiographic vasospasm, thereby achieving a strong recommendation for its use in ruling in or out vasospasm, based on the high quality of evidence. TCDs had very low LR + and a reasonably low LR - , thereby achieving a weak recommendation against its use in ruling in vasospasm and weak recommendation for its use in ruling out vasospasm.
颅内血管痉挛是蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后的一种危及生命的并发症。虽然数字减影血管造影(DSA)是目前检测的金标准,但计算机断层血管造影(CTA)和经颅多普勒(TCD)的诊断性能仍存在争议。我们旨在根据 GRADE 标准总结现有证据并提供使用建议。对比较 CTA 或 TCD 与 DSA 用于检测成人(≥18 岁)aSAH 患者影像学血管痉挛的研究进行了文献检索。采用 DerSimonian-Laird 随机效应模型对敏感性和特异性及其 95%置信区间(CI)进行汇总,并得出阳性和阴性汇总似然比(LR+ / LR-)。在 2070 项研究中,有 7 项研究(1646 个动脉节段)符合纳入标准并进行了荟萃分析。与金标准(DSA)相比,CTA 的汇总敏感性为 82%(95%CI,68-91%),特异性为 97%(95%CI,93-98%),而 TCD 的敏感性较低,为 38%(95%CI,19-62%),特异性为 91%(95%CI,87-94%)。只有 CTA 的 LR+(27.3)达到了诊断的临床意义。CTA(0.19)和 TCD(0.68)的 LR-接近诊断排除的临床意义(<0.1)。与 TCD 相比,CTA 对诊断影像学血管痉挛的 LR+更高,LR-更低,因此基于高质量证据,强烈推荐使用 CTA 来确定或排除血管痉挛。TCD 的 LR+非常低,LR-相对较低,因此强烈反对将其用于确定血管痉挛,并且对其用于排除血管痉挛的推荐力度较弱。