University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Birmingham, AL.
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Birmingham, AL.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Feb;19(2):e263-e273. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00472. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
As outcomes improve in early-stage breast cancer, clinical trials are undergoing a paradigm shift from intensification trials (more therapy) to improve survival to optimization trials, which assess the potential for using less toxic therapy while preserving survival outcomes. However, little is known about perspectives in community and academic settings about possible barriers and facilitators that could affect accrual to optimization clinical trials and the generalizability of future findings.
We conducted a qualitative study with semistructured interviews of medical oncologists from different academic and community practices to assess their perspectives on optimization trials. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Three independent coders used a content analysis approach to analyze transcripts using NVivo. Major themes and exemplary quotes were extracted.
All 39 physicians reported that they would enroll patients in optimization clinical trials. Oncologists highlighted specific reasons to consider optimization trials. These included quality-of-life improvement by reducing toxicity, reduction in financial toxicity, fertility preservation, ability to avoid chemotherapy, minimization of overtreatment in patients with comorbid conditions, personalized treatment, opportunities to test novel therapies, and leveraging the availability of targeted therapies. Oncologists also identified accrual barriers, such as tumor-specific biology, individual (host) factors, prognostic markers of risk, access to therapies, provider experience, and system constraints. They voiced recommendations regarding preliminary data, trial design, and tools to support enrollment in optimization trials.
Although oncologists are generally willing to enroll patients on optimization clinical trials, barriers affect their acceptance. A scientific focus on overcoming these barriers is needed to support future enrollment on trials tailoring therapy on the basis of risk and potential benefit to allow true personalization of treatment.
随着早期乳腺癌患者的治疗效果改善,临床试验正在从强化治疗(更多的治疗)以提高生存率转变为优化治疗试验,后者评估使用毒性较低的治疗方法同时保留生存结果的潜力。然而,对于可能影响优化临床试验入组和未来研究结果普遍性的社区和学术环境中的障碍和促进因素,人们知之甚少。
我们对来自不同学术和社区实践的肿瘤内科医生进行了一项半结构化访谈的定性研究,以评估他们对优化试验的看法。访谈进行了录音和转录。三位独立的编码员使用 NVivo 中的内容分析方法对转录本进行分析。提取主要主题和典型引述。
所有 39 名医生均报告说他们将招募患者参加优化临床试验。肿瘤学家强调了考虑优化试验的具体原因。这些原因包括通过降低毒性改善生活质量、减轻经济毒性、保留生育能力、避免化疗、在患有合并症的患者中尽量减少过度治疗、个性化治疗、测试新疗法的机会以及利用靶向治疗的可用性。肿瘤学家还确定了入组障碍,如肿瘤特异性生物学、个体(宿主)因素、风险的预后标志物、治疗方法的可及性、提供者经验和系统限制。他们对优化试验的初步数据、试验设计和支持入组的工具提出了建议。
尽管肿瘤学家通常愿意招募患者参加优化临床试验,但障碍影响了他们的接受程度。需要对克服这些障碍进行科学研究,以支持未来根据风险和潜在获益来调整治疗的试验入组,从而真正实现治疗的个体化。