College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 16802, United States.
College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 16802, United States.
Alcohol. 2023 May;108:30-43. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
Wrist-worn transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) sensors have the potential to provide detailed information about day-level features of alcohol use but have rarely been used in field-based research or in early adulthood (i.e., 26-40 years) alcohol users. This pilot study assessed the acceptability, user burden, and validity of using the BACtrack Skyn across 28 days in individuals' natural settings. Adults aged 26-37 (N = 11, M = 31.2, 55% female, 73% non-Hispanic white) participated in a study including retrospective surveys, a 28-day field protocol wearing Skyn and SCRAM sensors and completing ecological momentary assessments (EMA) of alcohol use and duration (daily morning reports and participant-initiated start/stop drinking EMAs), and follow-up interviews. Day-level features of alcohol use extracted from self-reports and/or sensors included drinks consumed, estimated Blood Alcohol Concentration (eBAC), drinking duration, peak TAC, area under the curve (AUC), rise rate, and fall rate. Repeated-measures correlations (r) tested within-person associations between day-level features of alcohol use from the Skyn versus self-report or the SCRAM. Participants preferred wearing the Skyn over the SCRAM [t (10) = -6.79, p < .001, d = 2.74]. Skyn data were available for 5614 (74.2%) out of 7566 h, with 20.7% of data lost due to syncing/charging issues and 5.1% lost due to device removal. Skyn agreement for detecting drinking days was 55.5% and 70.3% when compared to self-report and the SCRAM, respectively. Correlations for drinking intensity between self-report and the Skyn were 0.35 for peak TAC, 0.52 for AUC, and 0.30 for eBAC, which were smaller than correlations between self-report and SCRAM, at 0.78 for peak TAC, 0.79 for AUC, and 0.61 for eBAC. Correlations for drinking duration were larger when comparing self-report to the Skyn (r = 0.36) versus comparing self-report to the SCRAM (r = 0.31). The Skyn showed moderate-to-large, significant correlations with the SCRAM for peak TAC (r = 0.54), AUC (r = 0.80), and drinking duration (r = 0.63). Our findings support the acceptability and validity of using the Skyn for assessing alcohol use across an extended time frame (i.e., 28 days) in individuals' natural settings, and for providing useful information about day-level features of alcohol use.
腕戴式经皮酒精浓度(TAC)传感器具有提供关于酒精使用的日常特征的详细信息的潜力,但在现场研究或在 26-40 岁的早期成年人群中(即 26-40 岁)的使用很少。这项初步研究评估了在个体的自然环境中使用 BACtrack Skyn 进行 28 天的可接受性、用户负担和有效性。年龄在 26-37 岁的成年人(N=11,M=31.2,55%为女性,73%为非西班牙裔白人)参加了一项研究,包括回顾性调查、Skyn 和 SCRAM 传感器的 28 天现场方案以及完成酒精使用和持续时间的生态瞬时评估(EMA)(每日早晨报告和参与者发起的开始/停止饮酒 EMA),以及后续访谈。从自我报告和/或传感器中提取的酒精使用的日常特征包括饮用的饮料、估计的血液酒精浓度(eBAC)、饮酒持续时间、TAC 峰值、曲线下面积(AUC)、上升率和下降率。重复测量相关系数(r)测试了 Skyn 与自我报告或 SCRAM 中酒精使用的日常特征之间的个体内关联。与 SCRAM 相比,参与者更喜欢佩戴 Skyn [t (10)=-6.79,p<.001,d=2.74]。Skyn 数据可用于 7566 小时中的 5614 小时(74.2%),由于同步/充电问题丢失了 20.7%的数据,由于设备移除丢失了 5.1%的数据。Skyn 检测饮酒日的准确率为 55.5%,与自我报告相比为 70.3%,与 SCRAM 相比为 70.3%。自我报告与 Skyn 之间的饮酒强度相关性分别为 0.35 的 TAC 峰值,0.52 的 AUC 和 0.30 的 eBAC,与自我报告与 SCRAM 之间的相关性相比,TAC 峰值为 0.78,AUC 为 0.79,eBAC 为 0.61。与自我报告与 SCRAM 相比(r=0.31)相比,自我报告与 Skyn 的相关性更大(r=0.36)。Skyn 与 SCRAM 之间的 TAC 峰值(r=0.54)、AUC(r=0.80)和饮酒持续时间(r=0.63)的相关性具有中等至较大,具有显著意义。我们的研究结果支持在个体的自然环境中使用 Skyn 评估酒精使用的可接受性和有效性,并且可以提供有关酒精使用的日常特征的有用信息。