Haridoss SelvaKumar, R Bhavyaa, Swaminathan Kavitha, P Aruna
Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Nov 1;14(11):e30995. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30995. eCollection 2022 Nov.
The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the shaping properties and outcomes of reciprocating instruments in primary teeth. A search was conducted across various electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO (dentistry and oral health sciences), LILACS, Cochrane, Google Scholar (first 100 hits), Open Grey, Ovid, and Shodhganga. Two authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment of the selected articles using Rayyan software. A total of 12 studies were included. All 12 included studies qualified for qualitative analysis and five for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed there was no statistical significance between rotary and reciprocating instruments concerning instrumentation time and canal transportation. The rotary and reciprocating instruments showed better shaping outcomes than hand instruments. Randomized controlled trials are required with adequate quality to perform a meta-analysis to provide better and more substantial evidence to use reciprocating instruments.
本系统评价的目的是研究乳牙中往复式器械的成形特性和效果。在多个电子数据库中进行了检索,如PubMed、Scopus、EBSCO(牙科和口腔健康科学)、LILACS、Cochrane、谷歌学术(前100条记录)、Open Grey、Ovid和Shodhganga。两位作者使用Rayyan软件独立对所选文章进行数据提取和质量评估。共纳入12项研究。所有12项纳入研究均符合定性分析要求,5项符合荟萃分析要求。荟萃分析显示,在器械操作时间和根管偏移方面,旋转式器械和往复式器械之间无统计学意义。旋转式器械和往复式器械的成形效果优于手动器械。需要进行高质量的随机对照试验以进行荟萃分析,从而为使用往复式器械提供更好、更充分的证据。