Comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping methods for iron-sensitive susceptibility imaging at 7T: An evaluation in healthy subjects and patients with Huntington's disease.

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is a promising tool for investigating iron dysregulation in neurodegenerative diseases, including Huntington's disease (HD). Many diverse methods have been proposed to generate accurate and robust QSM images. In this study, we evaluated the performance of different dipole inversion algorithms for iron-sensitive susceptibility imaging at 7T on healthy subjects of a large age range and patients with HD. We compared an iterative least-squares-based method (iLSQR), iterative methods that use regularization, single-step approaches, and deep learning-based techniques. Their performance was evaluated by comparing: (1) deviations from a multiple-orientation QSM reference; (2) visual appearance of QSM maps and the presence of artifacts; (3) susceptibility in subcortical brain regions with age; (4) regional brain susceptibility with published postmortem brain iron quantification; and (5) susceptibility in HD-affected basal ganglia regions between HD subjects and healthy controls. We found that single-step QSM methods with either total variation or total generalized variation constraints (SSTV/SSTGV) and the single-step deep learning method iQSM generally provided the best performance in terms of correlation with iron deposition and were better at differentiating between healthy controls and premanifest HD individuals, while deep learning QSM methods trained with multiple-orientation susceptibility data created QSM maps that were most similar to the multiple orientation reference and with the best visual scores.