• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界卫生组织功能与残疾分类(FDD11)工具:一种按残疾情况对数据进行分类的可靠方法。

WHO Functioning and Disability Disaggregation (FDD11) tool: a reliable approach for disaggregating data by disability.

作者信息

Lee Lindsay, Kamenov Kaloyan, Fellinghauer Carolina, Sabariego Carla, Chatterji Somnath, Cieza Alarcos

机构信息

Sensory Functions, Disability and Rehabilitation, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.

Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Arch Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;80(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-01001-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13690-022-01001-2
PMID:36476629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9730553/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a global scarcity of good quality disability data, which has contributed to a lack of political will to address the challenges that persons with disabilities face. The current paper proposes a way forward to overcome this gap by demonstrating the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Functioning and Disability Disaggregation Tool (FDD11) - a brief disability disaggregation instrument that countries can use.

RESULTS

The study demonstrated that FDD11 is a valid and reliable tool. Unidimensionality of the scale produced by each calibration was supported by the factor analysis performed. The analysis indicated good fit of the items, and targeting of the items was deemed to be sufficient. The person separation index was 0.82, indicating good reliability of the final scale.

CONCLUSION

FDD11 provides a good opportunity to researchers and governments to capture good quality disability data and to disaggregate existing data by disability. The tool can facilitate low- and middle-income countries in their efforts to develop evidenced-based policies to address any barriers faced by persons with disabilities, to monitor the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Sustainable Development Goals, and to take stock of the challenges that still remain.

摘要

背景

全球高质量残疾数据匮乏,这导致缺乏应对残疾人所面临挑战的政治意愿。本文提出了一条前进的道路,通过展示世界卫生组织功能与残疾分类工具(FDD11)的心理测量特性来克服这一差距,FDD11是一种各国可使用的简要残疾分类工具。

结果

研究表明FDD11是一种有效且可靠的工具。每次校准所产生量表的单维性得到了所进行的因素分析的支持。分析表明项目拟合良好,且项目针对性被认为是充分的。人员分离指数为0.82,表明最终量表具有良好的可靠性。

结论

FDD11为研究人员和政府提供了一个良好机会,以获取高质量残疾数据并按残疾情况对现有数据进行分类。该工具可协助低收入和中等收入国家努力制定循证政策,以应对残疾人所面临的任何障碍,监测《残疾人权利公约》和可持续发展目标的实施情况,并评估仍然存在的挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6011/9730553/91c0c6470d06/13690_2022_1001_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6011/9730553/91c0c6470d06/13690_2022_1001_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6011/9730553/91c0c6470d06/13690_2022_1001_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
WHO Functioning and Disability Disaggregation (FDD11) tool: a reliable approach for disaggregating data by disability.世界卫生组织功能与残疾分类(FDD11)工具:一种按残疾情况对数据进行分类的可靠方法。
Arch Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;80(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-01001-2.
2
Can we still ensure no one is left behind by 2030? Demonstrating the potential of the implementation of the WHO Functioning and Disability Disaggregation Tool (FDD11) in existing survey platforms for disaggregating SDG indicators by disability.到2030年我们还能否确保不让任何一个人掉队?展示在世卫组织功能与残疾分类工具(FDD11)在现有调查平台上实施的潜力,以便按残疾情况对可持续发展目标指标进行分类。
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Mar;47(5):1253-1265. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2367597. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
3
Measuring functioning and disability using household surveys: metric properties of the brief version of the WHO and World Bank model disability survey.利用家庭调查衡量功能与残疾情况:世界卫生组织和世界银行残疾调查模型简版的度量属性
Arch Public Health. 2021 Jul 12;79(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00654-9.
4
Estimating disability prevalence in population surveys: an exploratory study using national surveys carried out in Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania and USA.在人口调查中估算残疾患病率:一项利用埃塞俄比亚、乌干达、坦桑尼亚和美国开展的全国性调查进行的探索性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Aug;47(16):4212-4219. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2441424. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
5
Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the attitudes to disability scale in people with physical disabilities.伊朗版身体残疾者残疾态度量表的心理测量学特性
BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 27;13(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02493-7.
6
Generating comprehensive functioning and disability data worldwide: development process, data analyses strategy and reliability of the WHO and World Bank Model Disability Survey.在全球范围内生成全面的功能与残疾数据:世界卫生组织和世界银行残疾调查模型的开发过程、数据分析策略及可靠性
Arch Public Health. 2022 Jan 4;80(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00769-z.
7
Measuring functional disability in children with developmental disorders in low-resource settings: validation of Developmental Disorders-Children Disability Assessment Schedule (DD-CDAS) in rural Pakistan.在资源匮乏地区测量发育障碍儿童的功能残疾:《发育障碍-儿童残疾评估量表》(DD-CDAS)在巴基斯坦农村地区的效度验证
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2020 Jul 13;7:e17. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2020.10. eCollection 2020.
8
Applying the ICF linking rules to compare population-based data from different sources: an exemplary analysis of tools used to collect information on disability.运用国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)链接规则比较来自不同来源的基于人群的数据:用于收集残疾信息的工具的示范分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):601-612. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1370734. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
9
Development and Validation of the 34-Item Disability Screening Questionnaire (DSQ-34) for Use in Low and Middle Income Countries Epidemiological and Development Surveys.用于低收入和中等收入国家流行病学及发展调查的34项残疾筛查问卷(DSQ-34)的开发与验证
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 2;10(12):e0143610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143610. eCollection 2015.
10
Is the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Impacting Mental Health Laws and Policies in High-Income Countries? A Case Study of Implementation in Canada.《联合国残疾人权利公约》对高收入国家的精神卫生法律和政策有影响吗?以加拿大的实施情况为例
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Nov 11;16(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0103-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a functioning metric for the ageing population using data from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE).利用欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查(SHARE)的数据,为老年人口制定一个有效的衡量标准。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 24;20(4):e0320068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320068. eCollection 2025.
2
[Measuring Disability in Participation Survey and Social Reporting].[参与调查和社会报告中的残疾测量]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2024 Oct;63(5):316-322. doi: 10.1055/a-2366-5317. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
3
Immigration status-related exclusive e-cigarette use and cannabis use and their dual use disparities associated with mental health disorder symptoms.

本文引用的文献

1
Rasch Reporting Guideline for Rehabilitation Research (RULER): the RULER Statement.Rasch 康复研究报告准则(RULER):RULER 声明。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul;103(7):1477-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
2
Generating comprehensive functioning and disability data worldwide: development process, data analyses strategy and reliability of the WHO and World Bank Model Disability Survey.在全球范围内生成全面的功能与残疾数据:世界卫生组织和世界银行残疾调查模型的开发过程、数据分析策略及可靠性
Arch Public Health. 2022 Jan 4;80(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00769-z.
3
Measuring functioning and disability using household surveys: metric properties of the brief version of the WHO and World Bank model disability survey.
与移民身份相关的电子烟和大麻的单独使用及其与精神健康障碍症状相关的双重使用差异。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Feb 1;255:111083. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111083. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
利用家庭调查衡量功能与残疾情况:世界卫生组织和世界银行残疾调查模型简版的度量属性
Arch Public Health. 2021 Jul 12;79(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00654-9.
4
COVID-19 deaths in people with intellectual disability in the UK and Ireland: descriptive study.英国和爱尔兰智力残疾人群中的新冠病毒疾病死亡情况:描述性研究
BJPsych Open. 2020 Oct 16;6(6):e123. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.102.
5
Critical Values for Yen's : Identification of Local Dependence in the Rasch Model Using Residual Correlations.严氏临界值:使用残差相关性识别拉施模型中的局部依赖性
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 May;41(3):178-194. doi: 10.1177/0146621616677520. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
6
Rethinking Disability.重新思考残疾问题。
BMC Med. 2018 Jan 26;16(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-1002-6.
7
Measuring Disability in Population Based Surveys: The Interrelationship between Clinical Impairments and Reported Functional Limitations in Cameroon and India.基于人群调查的残疾测量:喀麦隆和印度临床损伤与报告的功能受限之间的相互关系
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 14;11(10):e0164470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164470. eCollection 2016.
8
Measuring Disability: Comparing the Impact of Two Data Collection Approaches on Disability Rates.衡量残疾情况:比较两种数据收集方法对残疾率的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Aug 25;12(9):10329-51. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120910329.
9
PARADISE 24: A Measure to Assess the Impact of Brain Disorders on People's Lives.PARADISE 24:一种评估脑部疾病对人们生活影响的方法。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0132410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132410. eCollection 2015.
10
Culture and health.文化与健康。
Lancet. 2014 Nov 1;384(9954):1607-39. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61603-2. Epub 2014 Oct 29.