Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2022 Nov-Dec;33(6):13-19. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202204961.
To investigate whether foraminal widening performed at primary treatment has an effect on the amount of apically extruded obturator material during retreatment and to evaluate the sensitivity of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in detecting extruded obturator material.
Forty palatal roots of maxillary molars were selected based on micro-CT and divided into two groups (n=20): with foraminal widening (WE) and without foraminal widening (NE). To standardize the apical foramen, all specimens were instrumented to the foramen using the Protaper Next system, up to instrument X3. The WE group was instrumented to the foramen up to instrument X5, and the NE group was instrumented 1 mm lower. The canals were obturated 1 mm below the apical foramen with gutta-percha and AH Plus and stored for 7 days at 37 °C and 95% humidity. Roots were fixed in microtubes filled with 1.5% agar gel. The obturation material was removed with Reciproc R50. Scans of the teeth and agar were performed using micro-CT and CBCT. Comparison between groups and between methods was performed using Mann-Withney test (p ≤0.05).
No statistical difference was found when comparing the extruded material between groups using micro-CT (p = 0.589) or CBCT (p = 0.953). CBCT measured a greater volume of extruded material than micro- CT (p = 0.0004).
Foraminal widening had no effect on the extrusion of filling material during retreatment. The CBCT favored the evaluation of apically extruded filling material.
研究初次治疗时行根管口扩大术是否会影响再治疗时根尖挤出的牙胶量,并评估锥形束 CT(CBCT)检测根尖挤出牙胶的敏感性。
根据微 CT 选择 40 颗上颌磨牙腭根,分为两组(n=20):根管口扩大(WE)组和未根管口扩大(NE)组。为了标准化根尖孔,所有标本均使用 Protaper Next 系统根管预备至根尖孔,至器械 X3。WE 组预备至根尖孔至器械 X5,NE 组预备至根尖孔下 1mm。根管用牙胶尖和 AH Plus 至根尖孔下 1mm 进行充填,并在 37°C 和 95%湿度下储存 7 天。将根固定在装满 1.5%琼脂凝胶的微管中。用 Reciproc R50 去除充填材料。使用微 CT 和 CBCT 对牙齿和琼脂进行扫描。使用 Mann-Whitney 检验(p≤0.05)比较两组和两种方法之间的差异。
微 CT(p=0.589)或 CBCT(p=0.953)均未发现两组之间挤出材料的统计学差异。CBCT 测量的挤出材料体积大于微 CT(p=0.0004)。
初次治疗时行根管口扩大术对再治疗时充填材料的挤出无影响。CBCT 有利于评估根尖挤出的充填材料。