Silva Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal, Teixeira João M, Kudsi Nancy, Sassone Luciana M, Krebs Renato L, Coutinho-Filho Tauby S
Universidade Grande Rio, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2016 Jan-Feb;27(1):28-31. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201600337.
The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris by single-file reciprocating instruments with different working lengths and apical preparation sizes. Eighty human single-rooted mandibular incisors were used and conventional access cavities were prepared. Then, the specimens were divided into four groups (n=20), according to root canal instrumentation: Reciproc size 25, .08 taper and Reciproc size 40, .06 taper instruments were used at the foramen; Reciproc size 25, .08 taper and Reciproc size 40, .06 taper instruments were used 1 mm short of the foramen. Distilled water was used as an irrigant and the apically extruded debris were collected in pre-weighted glass vials and dried afterwards. The mean weight of debris was weighed with a microbalance and statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey multiple comparison test (p<0.05). The results showed that all experimental groups were associated with debris extrusion. No significant difference was found in the amount of apically extruded debris among all experimental groups (p>0.05). The present study demonstrated that the working length and the apical preparation size did not have a significant effect on debris extrusion when performing single-file reciprocating instrumentation.
本研究的目的是定量评估使用不同工作长度和根尖预备尺寸的单根往复器械时根尖挤出碎屑的量。使用了80颗人单根下颌切牙,并制备了传统的开髓洞形。然后,根据根管预备情况将标本分为四组(n = 20):在根尖孔处使用Reciproc 25号、0.08锥度和Reciproc 40号、0.06锥度的器械;在距根尖孔1 mm处使用Reciproc 25号、0.08锥度和Reciproc 40号、0.06锥度的器械。使用蒸馏水作为冲洗液,将根尖挤出的碎屑收集在预先称重的玻璃小瓶中,然后干燥。用微量天平称取碎屑的平均重量,并使用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey多重比较检验进行统计学分析(p<0.05)。结果表明,所有实验组均有碎屑挤出。所有实验组之间根尖挤出碎屑的量没有显著差异(p>0.05)。本研究表明,在进行单根往复根管预备时,工作长度和根尖预备尺寸对碎屑挤出没有显著影响。