Buckler Andrew J, Gotto Antonio M, Rajeev Akshay, Nicolaou Anna, Sakamoto Atsushi, St Pierre Samantha, Phillips Matthew, Virmani Renu, Villines Todd C
Department of Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Elucid Bioimaging Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Atherosclerosis. 2023 Feb;366:42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2022.11.013. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
The application of machine learning to assess plaque risk phenotypes on cardiovascular CT angiography (CTA) is an area of active investigation. Studies using accepted histologic definitions of plaque risk as ground truth for machine learning models are uncommon. The aim was to evaluate the accuracy of a machine-learning software for determining plaque risk phenotype as compared to expert pathologists (histologic ground truth).
Sections of atherosclerotic plaques paired with CTA were prospectively collected from patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy at two centers. Specimens were annotated for lipid-rich necrotic core, calcification, matrix, and intraplaque hemorrhage at 2 mm spacing and classified as minimal disease, stable plaque, or unstable plaque according to a modified American Heart Association histological definition. Phenotype is determined in two steps: plaque morphology is delineated according to histological tissue definitions, followed by a machine learning classifier. The performance in derivation and validation cohorts for plaque risk categorization and stenosis was compared to histologic ground truth at each matched cross-section.
A total of 496 and 408 vessel cross-sections in the derivation and validation cohorts (from 30 and 23 patients, respectively). The software demonstrated excellent agreement in the validation cohort with histological ground truth plaque risk phenotypes with weighted kappa of 0.82 [0.78-0.86] and area under the receiver operating curve for correct identification of plaque type was 0.97 [0.96, 0.98], 0.95 [0.94, 0.97], 0.99 [0.99, 1.0] for unstable plaque, stable plaque, and minimal disease, respectively. Diameter stenosis correlated poorly to histologically defined plaque type; weighted kappa 0.25 in the validation cohort.
A machine-learning software trained on histological ground-truth tissue inputs demonstrated high accuracy for identifying plaque stability phenotypes as compared to expert pathologists.
将机器学习应用于心血管CT血管造影(CTA)以评估斑块风险表型是一个活跃的研究领域。使用公认的斑块风险组织学定义作为机器学习模型的基本事实的研究并不常见。目的是评估一种机器学习软件与专家病理学家(组织学基本事实)相比,确定斑块风险表型的准确性。
前瞻性收集了两个中心接受颈动脉内膜切除术患者的动脉粥样硬化斑块切片及CTA图像。标本以2毫米间距标注富含脂质的坏死核心、钙化、基质和斑块内出血,并根据改良的美国心脏协会组织学定义分为轻度病变、稳定斑块或不稳定斑块。表型通过两个步骤确定:根据组织学组织定义描绘斑块形态,然后进行机器学习分类器。将推导队列和验证队列中斑块风险分类和狭窄的表现与每个匹配横截面的组织学基本事实进行比较。
推导队列和验证队列中分别有496个和408个血管横截面(分别来自30名和