• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种种植体固位下颌覆盖义齿的口腔健康相关生活质量和患者满意度评价:一项随机交叉临床试验。

Evaluation of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction in Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2023 Nov 1;36(5):554-562. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7909.

DOI:10.11607/ijp.7909
PMID:36484663
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and patient satisfaction with a three-implant-retained mandibular overdenture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this randomized crossover clinical trial, 20 edentulous patients received a new set of conventional complete dentures (CDs; baseline). Subsequently, three implants were placed in the anterior mandible: two were placed in the canine regions bilaterally and one in the midline. After successful osseointegration, CDs were attached to the implants using resilient attachments. The overdenture was retained either by three implants (test group) or two implants (control group). The sequence of treatment was randomized such that each patient experienced both treatment options for 6 months each. OHRQoL was assessed at baseline and after 6 months of function for each treatment option using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Statistical analyses were performed using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

RESULTS

CD resulted in significantly higher OHIP-14 and VAS scores (25.25 + 6.42, 8.55 + 1.73) compared to both the control group (11.15 + 5.39, 4 + 2; P < .001) and the test group (6.25 + 4.02, 2.06 + 1.48; P < .001). Similarly, significantly higher mean OHIP-14 and VAS scores were noted for the control group compared to the test group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Overdentures retained by three implants resulted in better OHRQoL scores and higher patient satisfaction compared to overdentures retained by two implants and CDs. Int J Prosthodont 2023;36:554-56.

摘要

目的

评估三种植体固位下颌覆盖义齿的口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)和患者满意度。

材料和方法

在这项随机交叉临床试验中,20 名无牙颌患者接受了一套新的常规全口义齿(CD;基线)。随后,在前下颌植入三颗种植体:双侧犬齿区各植入两颗,中线区植入一颗。成功骨整合后,使用弹性附着体将 CD 附着到种植体上。覆盖义齿通过三个种植体(实验组)或两个种植体(对照组)固位。治疗顺序是随机的,每个患者都体验了两种治疗方案,每种方案各 6 个月。在基线和每种治疗方案使用 6 个月后,使用口腔健康影响简表(OHIP-14)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分评估 OHRQoL。使用 Friedman 和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行统计分析。

结果

CD 的 OHIP-14 和 VAS 评分(25.25 + 6.42,8.55 + 1.73)明显高于对照组(11.15 + 5.39,4 + 2;P <.001)和实验组(6.25 + 4.02,2.06 + 1.48;P <.001)。同样,对照组的 OHIP-14 和 VAS 评分明显高于实验组(P <.001)。

结论

与用两个种植体和 CD 固位的覆盖义齿相比,用三个种植体固位的覆盖义齿可获得更好的 OHRQoL 评分和更高的患者满意度。国际口腔修复杂志 2023;36:554-56。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction in Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial.三种种植体固位下颌覆盖义齿的口腔健康相关生活质量和患者满意度评价:一项随机交叉临床试验。
Int J Prosthodont. 2023 Nov 1;36(5):554-562. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7909.
2
Implant Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Immediately Loaded Implants: A 1-Year Randomized Trial Comparing Patient-Based Outcomes Between Mini Dental Implants and Standard-Sized Implants.即刻负重种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿:一项为期1年的随机试验,比较微型种植牙与标准尺寸种植牙基于患者的治疗效果。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):197-205. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6009.
3
Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Different Attachments Used for Implant-Retained Overdentures in Subjects with Resorbed Mandibles: A Crossover Trial.不同附着体用于下颌骨吸收患者种植覆盖义齿的满意度和口腔健康相关生活质量的比较:一项交叉试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):423-431. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7869.
4
Angled ball and locator attachments for immediate loaded inclined implants used to retain maxillary overdentures: A cross over study of patient satisfaction and oral health related quality of life.用于保留上颌覆盖义齿的即刻加载倾斜种植体的角度球和定位器附件:患者满意度和口腔健康相关生活质量的交叉研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Jun;24(3):391-400. doi: 10.1111/cid.13089. Epub 2022 May 3.
5
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Edentulous Patients with Two- vs Four-Locator-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study.使用两个定位器与四个定位器固位的下颌覆盖义齿的无牙患者的口腔健康相关生活质量:一项前瞻性、随机、交叉研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(5):1143-8. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3987.
6
Patient-based outcomes with conventional or mini-implants immediately loaded with locator-retained mandibular overdentures: A cohort study.常规或微型种植体即刻负载Locator 附着式下颌覆盖义齿的基于患者的结局:一项队列研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Dec;22(6):723-729. doi: 10.1111/cid.12955. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
7
Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.三种种植体支持的固定义齿与两种种植体固位的覆盖义齿在下颌无牙颌中的疗效比较:一项治疗效果和患者满意度的初步研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):415-26.
8
Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of conventional denture, fixed prosthesis and milled bar overdenture for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation. A crossover study.全口 4 颗种植体即刻负重修复中传统义齿、固定义齿和铣削杆覆盖义齿对患者满意度和口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的影响:一项交叉研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Nov;30(11):1107-1117. doi: 10.1111/clr.13524. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
9
A Pilot Study on Mandibular Overdentures Retained By Mini Dental Implants: Marginal Bone Level Changes and Patient-Based Ratings of Clinical Outcome.一项关于微型牙种植体固位下颌覆盖义齿的初步研究:边缘骨水平变化及基于患者的临床结果评价
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):1171-8. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4339.
10
A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures.一项为期5年的随机试验,比较用于种植覆盖义齿的1枚或2枚种植体。
J Dent Res. 2015 Jan;94(1):36-43. doi: 10.1177/0022034514554224. Epub 2014 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Two- Versus Four-Narrow-Implant-Retained Dentures With Immediate-Loaded Anterior Implants: 9 Years Randomized Clinical Trial.即刻负重前牙种植的两颗与四颗窄种植体固位义齿:9年随机临床试验
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70033. doi: 10.1111/cid.70033.