Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel. 281 1st Ave, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA.
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023 Jun;72(6):1355-1364. doi: 10.1007/s00262-022-03341-y. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) or immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), either alone or in combination, confers a significant overall survival (OS) benefit for metastatic RCC in the first-line setting. However, guidance for optimal treatment selection in elderly patients remains limited.
A database search was performed to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating first-line regimens for patients with advanced RCC older than 65 years old. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Indirect comparisons of available regimens were estimated using a random-effects network meta-analysis.
A total of 14 and five RCTs were eligible for PFS and OS analyses. Compared with sunitinib, pembrolizumab plus axitinib (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97) and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.4-0.94) were associated with improved OS. Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib, pembrolizumab plus axitinib, and cabozantinib alone each showed improved PFS over sunitinib. Among these, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib showed better PFS than pembrolizumab plus axitinib (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91), but no PFS difference compared to nivolumab plus cabozantinib (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39-1.03) and cabozantinib alone (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.40-1.77). Network ranking showed pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib provided the favored OS and PFS benefit for elderly patients.
The combination of ICB with TKI such as pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib needs to be considered over monotherapy in the elderly population, but further validation using real-world data or prospective trials is necessary to confirm the efficacy and safety of first-line regimens for the geriatric population with advanced RCC.
酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)或免疫检查点阻断(ICB),无论是单独使用还是联合使用,都为转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)一线治疗带来了显著的总生存(OS)获益。然而,关于老年患者最佳治疗选择的指导仍然有限。
进行了数据库检索,以确定评估年龄大于 65 岁的晚期 RCC 患者一线治疗方案的合格随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是无进展生存期(PFS)和 OS。使用随机效应网络荟萃分析估计可用方案的间接比较。
共有 14 项和 5 项 RCT 分别符合 PFS 和 OS 分析。与舒尼替尼相比,帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼(HR 0.68,95%CI 0.48-0.97)和帕博利珠单抗联合仑伐替尼(HR 0.61,95%CI 0.4-0.94)均与 OS 改善相关。帕博利珠单抗联合仑伐替尼、纳武利尤单抗联合卡博替尼、帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼和卡博替尼单药治疗均显示 PFS 优于舒尼替尼。在这些方案中,帕博利珠单抗联合仑伐替尼的 PFS 优于帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼(HR 0.58,95%CI 0.37-0.91),但与纳武利尤单抗联合卡博替尼(HR 0.63,95%CI 0.39-1.03)和卡博替尼单药(HR 0.84,95%CI 0.40-1.77)相比,PFS 无差异。网络排名显示,帕博利珠单抗联合仑伐替尼为老年患者提供了有利的 OS 和 PFS 获益。
对于老年人群,需要考虑将 ICB 与 TKI(如帕博利珠单抗联合仑伐替尼)联合治疗,而使用真实世界数据或前瞻性试验进一步验证老年晚期 RCC 患者一线治疗方案的疗效和安全性是必要的。