• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加强城市绿地中的公平与包容:审视多伦多公园中 2SLGBTQ+社区的道德管理与治安。

Strengthening Equity and Inclusion in Urban Greenspace: Interrogating the Moral Management & Policing of 2SLGBTQ+ Communities in Toronto Parks.

机构信息

Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;19(23):15505. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315505.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192315505
PMID:36497589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9739696/
Abstract

There is growing recognition that greenspace provides invaluable benefits to health and wellbeing, and is essential infrastructure for promoting both social and environmental sustainability in urban settings. This paper contributes towards efforts to build 'just' and equitable urban sustainability, and more specifically greenspace management, by drawing attention to hostility and exclusion experienced by two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, genderqueer, pansexual, transsexual, intersex and gender-variant (2SLGBTQ+) park occupants. There is evidence that access to greenspace is inequitable-despite ongoing media accounts of targeted violence and discriminatory police patrolling of 2SLGBTQ+ communities in urban parks, this population has not received adequate research attention. This paper examines systemic barriers that impede urban greenspace access among 2SLGBTQ+ communities, including how the threat of violence in greenspace limits opportunities for accessing benefits associated with naturalized settings. These themes are explored within the context of the City of Toronto, Canada. Our mixed-method approach draws upon key informant interviews, key document content analysis, and ground-truthing. Our findings reveal how queer corporeality, kinship and love subvert deeply entrenched heteronormative social values and understandings of sexuality, partnership, gender, and use of public space, challenging institutional understandings of morality and daily life. The paper concludes by reflecting on the state of 2SLGBTQ+ communities' relationships to greenspace, and potential ways forward in building greater inclusivity into the social fabric of park design and management.

摘要

越来越多的人认识到,绿地为健康和福祉提供了无价的益处,是促进城市环境社会和环境可持续性的必要基础设施。本文通过关注双性恋、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿、性别酷儿、泛性恋、变性人、间性人和性别变异者(2SLGBTQ+)公园使用者所经历的敌意和排斥,为建设“公正”和公平的城市可持续性,特别是绿地管理做出了贡献。尽管有媒体不断报道针对 2SLGBTQ+社区的有针对性的暴力行为和歧视性的警察巡逻,但绿地的获取仍然存在不平等现象,但这一人群并没有得到足够的研究关注。本文研究了阻碍 2SLGBTQ+社区进入城市绿地的系统性障碍,包括绿地中的暴力威胁如何限制了与自然环境相关的利益的获取机会。这些主题是在加拿大多伦多市的背景下探讨的。我们的混合方法方法借鉴了关键知情人访谈、关键文件内容分析和实地考察。我们的研究结果揭示了酷儿肉体、亲情和爱情如何颠覆根深蒂固的异性恋规范的社会价值观和对性、伴侣关系、性别和公共空间使用的理解,挑战了对道德和日常生活的机构理解。本文最后反思了 2SLGBTQ+社区与绿地的关系的现状,以及在将更大的包容性纳入公园设计和管理的社会结构方面的潜在前进方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2532/9739696/88bd235f6459/ijerph-19-15505-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2532/9739696/c69933e4999c/ijerph-19-15505-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2532/9739696/88bd235f6459/ijerph-19-15505-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2532/9739696/c69933e4999c/ijerph-19-15505-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2532/9739696/88bd235f6459/ijerph-19-15505-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Strengthening Equity and Inclusion in Urban Greenspace: Interrogating the Moral Management & Policing of 2SLGBTQ+ Communities in Toronto Parks.加强城市绿地中的公平与包容:审视多伦多公园中 2SLGBTQ+社区的道德管理与治安。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;19(23):15505. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315505.
2
A Framework for Enhancing Access to Equitable Home Care for 2SLGBTQ+ Communities.增强 2SLGBTQ+ 社区获得公平家庭护理的框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 16;17(20):7533. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207533.
3
Health of two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people experiencing poverty in Canada: a review.在加拿大,贫困的双灵人、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者的健康:综述。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Feb 17;37(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab057.
4
Compassionate Discourses: A Qualitative Study Exploring How Compassion Can Transform Healthcare for 2SLGBTQ+ People.悲悯之语:探索悲悯如何能改变 2SLGBTQ+ 人群的医疗保健服务的定性研究。
Qual Health Res. 2022 Aug;32(10):1514-1526. doi: 10.1177/10497323221110701. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
5
The two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender identity curriculum in Canadian Dental Schools: What are the gaps and proposed next steps?加拿大牙科学院的双灵人、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿和其他性与性别认同课程:存在哪些差距和建议的下一步措施?
J Dent Educ. 2024 Aug;88(8):1124-1132. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13549. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
6
The importance of health(ism): A focus group study of lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, queer and transgender individuals' understandings of health.健康主义的重要性:一项关于女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、泛性恋、酷儿和跨性别者对健康理解的焦点小组研究。
J Health Psychol. 2017 Feb;22(2):237-247. doi: 10.1177/1359105315600236. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
7
A Scoping Review of Oral Health Outcomes and Oral Health Service Utilization of 2SLGBTQ+ People.2SLGBTQ+ 人群的口腔健康结局和口腔卫生服务利用的范围综述。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2024 Jul;9(3):199-211. doi: 10.1177/23800844231206359. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
8
Safe, Seen, and Supported: Navigating Eating Disorders Recovery in the 2SLGBTQ+ Communities.安全、可见和支持:在 2SLGBTQ+ 社区中应对饮食失调康复。
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2023 Jun 1;84(2):84-92. doi: 10.3148/cjdpr-2022-033. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
9
"They Want You to Kill Your Inner Queer but Somehow Leave the Human Alive": Delineating the Impacts of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity and Expression Change Efforts.“他们希望你扼杀内心的酷儿,但又要设法让人性存活”:描述性取向和性别认同及表达改变努力的影响。
J Sex Res. 2022 May-Jun;59(5):599-609. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.1910616. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
10
[Using the environmental justice approach to evaluate equitable allocation of urban parks: A case study of main urban area of Nanjing, China].[运用环境正义方法评估城市公园的公平分配:以中国南京主城区为例]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Jun;33(6):1589-1598. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202206.027.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating social and ecological considerations in floodplain relocation and restoration programs.在洪泛区搬迁和恢复项目中纳入社会和生态考量因素。
Socioecol Pract Res. 2023 May 4:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s42532-023-00152-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Canopy of advantage: Who benefits most from city trees?树冠优势:谁是城市树木的最大受益者?
J Environ Manage. 2018 Feb 15;208:24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.015. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
2
Environmental injustice and sexual minority health disparities: A national study of inequitable health risks from air pollution among same-sex partners.环境不公与性少数群体健康差距:全国范围内研究同性伴侣因空气污染导致的健康风险不平等现象。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Oct;191:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.040. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
3
Are green cities healthy and equitable? Unpacking the relationship between health, green space and gentrification.
绿色城市是否健康且公平?剖析健康、绿色空间与 gentrification 之间的关系。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Nov;71(11):1118-1121. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209201. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
4
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Green Space Quality and Accessibility-Evidence from a Southern European City.绿地空间质量与可达性方面的社会经济不平等——来自南欧一座城市的证据
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 15;14(8):916. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080916.
5
Advancing Sustainability through Urban Green Space: Cultural Ecosystem Services, Equity, and Social Determinants of Health.通过城市绿色空间推进可持续发展:文化生态系统服务、公平性与健康的社会决定因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Feb 5;13(2):196. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13020196.
6
Just sustainability? Sustainability and social justice in professional codes of ethics for engineers.仅可持续性?工程师职业道德准则中的可持续性和社会正义。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):875-91. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9421-4. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
7
Vauxhall’s post-industrial pleasure gardens: "death wish" and hedonism in 21st-century London.沃克斯豪尔的后工业游乐花园:21 世纪伦敦的“死亡之愿”和享乐主义。
Urban Stud. 2011;48(1):85-100. doi: 10.1177/0042098009360238.
8
A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments.暴露于自然环境对健康的额外益处的证据进行的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 4;10:456. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-456.
9
From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis.从文本到编码:定性内容分析中的编码员信度评估
Nurs Res. 2008 Mar-Apr;57(2):113-7. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000313482.33917.7d.