Kim Jong Mi, Lee Yoon Hee, Chong Gun Oh, Lee Sae Rom, Hong Dae Gy
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 23;11(23):6905. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236905.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes between robotic multi-site myomectomy (RMSM) and robotic single-site myomectomy (RSSM), using the da Vinci® SP surgical system and perform propensity score matching analysis to ensure inter-group comparability. Methods: This retrospective study included 105 patients who underwent either three-incision RMSM or RSSM using the da Vinci® SP surgical system. We retrospectively reviewed and compared surgical outcomes using 1:1 propensity score matching. Results: After 1:1 propensity score matching, there were no differences in the total operation time and estimated blood loss between the groups. The docking time (p < 0.0001) and duration of hospital stay (p = 0.0001) were significantly shorter in the RSSM group than in the RMSM group. Conclusions: The surgical outcomes of RSSM were comparable to those of RMSM. Moreover, compared to RMSM, RSSM using the da Vinci® SP surgical system has shorter docking and morcellation times, and duration of hospital stay.
本研究旨在使用达芬奇® SP手术系统比较机器人多部位子宫肌瘤切除术(RMSM)和机器人单部位子宫肌瘤切除术(RSSM)的手术效果,并进行倾向评分匹配分析以确保组间可比性。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了105例行三切口RMSM或使用达芬奇® SP手术系统行RSSM的患者。我们采用1:1倾向评分匹配法回顾性分析并比较手术效果。结果:经过1:1倾向评分匹配后,两组间总手术时间和估计失血量无差异。RSSM组的对接时间(p < 0.0001)和住院时间(p = 0.0001)明显短于RMSM组。结论:RSSM的手术效果与RMSM相当。此外,与RMSM相比,使用达芬奇® SP手术系统的RSSM对接和粉碎时间以及住院时间更短。