Suppr超能文献

真空辅助分娩期间严重的产科肛门括约肌损伤:是产科问题还是与器械相关?

Substantial Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury during Vacuum Assisted Delivery: An Obstetrical Issue or Device Related?

作者信息

Baruch Yoav, Gold Ronen, Eisenberg Hagit, Amir Hadar, Yogev Yariv, Groutz Asnat

机构信息

Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.

Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 26;11(23):6990. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236990.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) might be associated with long-term urinary and anorectal morbidities. The aim of the study was to investigate the risk factors and clinical implications of OASIS associated with vacuum-assisted deliveries versus normal vaginal deliveries.

METHODS

A series of 413 consecutive OASIS cases were retrospectively analyzed. A comparison was made between OASIS cases diagnosed following vacuum-assisted deliveries versus OASIS cases diagnosed following normal vaginal deliveries. Multivariable analysis was used to study the association between vacuum-assisted deliveries and superficial (3A and 3B) versus deep (3C and 4) perineal tears.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 88,123 singleton vaginal deliveries. Diagnosis of OASIS was made in 413 women (0.47% of the total cohort), 379 (91.8%) of whom had third-degree tears and 34 (8.2%) of whom had fourth-degree tears. Among the 7410 vacuum-assisted deliveries, 102 (1.37%) had OASIS, whereas, among the 80,713 normal vaginal deliveries, only 311 (0.39%) had OASIS. In a multivariate analysis, only vacuum-assisted delivery was found to be associated with a significant risk of deeper (3C or 4) perineal tears (OR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.02-2.91; = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Vacuum-assisted instrumental intervention is a significant risk factor for OASIS and especially for deeper tears, independent of other maternal and obstetric risk factors.

摘要

背景

产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)可能与长期泌尿和肛肠疾病相关。本研究的目的是调查与真空辅助分娩相比,正常阴道分娩时OASIS的危险因素及临床意义。

方法

回顾性分析了连续413例OASIS病例。对真空辅助分娩后诊断出的OASIS病例与正常阴道分娩后诊断出的OASIS病例进行了比较。采用多变量分析研究真空辅助分娩与浅表(3A和3B)及深部(3C和4)会阴撕裂之间的关联。

结果

研究人群包括88123例单胎阴道分娩。413名女性(占总队列的0.47%)被诊断为OASIS,其中379例(91.8%)为三度撕裂,34例(8.2%)为四度撕裂。在7410例真空辅助分娩中,102例(1.37%)发生OASIS,而在80713例正常阴道分娩中,只有311例(0.39%)发生OASIS。在多变量分析中,仅发现真空辅助分娩与深部(3C或4)会阴撕裂的显著风险相关(OR = 1.72;95%CI 1.02 - 2.91;P = 0.043)。

结论

真空辅助器械干预是OASIS尤其是深部撕裂的重要危险因素,独立于其他孕产妇和产科危险因素。

相似文献

9

本文引用的文献

5
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury among parous women.经产妇发生产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;303(3):709-714. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05806-w. Epub 2020 Sep 25.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验