Kassubek Rebecca, Lindner-Pfleghar Beate, Virvidaki Ioanna Eleni, Kassubek Jan, Althaus Katharina, Weber Antonia Maria, Dimakopoulos Georgios, Milionis Haralampos, Nasios Grigorios
Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Department of Speech and Language Therapy, University of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 29;11(23):7087. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237087.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of the novel Functional Bedside Aspiration Screen (FBAS) to predict aspiration risk in acute stroke and to guide initial therapy needs. We conducted a prospective validation study of the FBAS 10-point scale in 101 acute ischemic stroke patients. Outcome measures were compared with the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) via the Flexible Endoscopic Swallowing Study. Correlations with the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and the Therapy Requirement Scale (TRS) were analyzed. We observed a 65.8% sensitivity and 70.2% specificity ( = 0.004) for predicting penetration risk (for PAS score ≥ 3) and a 73% sensitivity and 62% specificity for predicting aspiration risk (PAS score ≥ 6). For patients with a modified ranking scale 0-2 ( = 44) on admission, the predictive measurements of the FBAS yielded sensitivity and specificity values of 66.7% and 88.6% ( = 0.011). A significant negative correlation was found with PAS measurements, whereas a positive correlation was observed regarding FOIS. Significantly lower FBAS scores were observed in patients with high requirements for therapeutic interventions and dietary modification. FBAS may be regarded as an alternative time-efficient clinical support tool in settings in which instrumentation is not directly accessible. Further studies including a larger cohort of acute stroke patients with more severe neurological deficits are necessary.
本研究的目的是调查新型床边功能吞咽筛查(FBAS)预测急性卒中患者误吸风险及指导初始治疗需求的可靠性。我们对101例急性缺血性卒中患者的FBAS 10分制进行了前瞻性验证研究。通过软性内镜吞咽检查将结果测量与渗透误吸量表(PAS)进行比较。分析了与功能性经口摄食量表(FOIS)和治疗需求量表(TRS)的相关性。对于预测渗透风险(PAS评分≥3),我们观察到灵敏度为65.8%,特异度为70.2%(P = 0.004);对于预测误吸风险(PAS评分≥6),灵敏度为73%,特异度为62%。对于入院时改良Rankin量表评分为0 - 2分(n = 44)的患者,FBAS的预测测量得出的灵敏度和特异度值分别为66.7%和88.6%(P = 0.011)。发现与PAS测量存在显著负相关,而与FOIS存在正相关。在治疗干预和饮食调整需求高的患者中观察到FBAS评分显著更低。在无法直接进行仪器检查的情况下,FBAS可被视为一种省时的临床辅助工具。有必要开展进一步研究,纳入更多伴有更严重神经功能缺损的急性卒中患者队列。