Birkner Mattias, Schalk Julia, von den Driesch Peter, Schultz Erwin S
Institute of Medical Physics, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, City Hospital of Nuremberg, 90419 Nürnberg, Germany.
Department of Dermatology, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, City Hospital of Nuremberg, 90419 Nürnberg, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 30;11(23):7103. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237103.
(1) Background: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is often situated on the lower legs, and the differentiation from conventional leg ulcers (LU) is a challenging task due to the lack of clear clinical diagnostic criteria. Because of the different therapy concepts, misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis bears a great risk for patients. (2) Objective: to develop a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) capable of analysing wound photographs to facilitate the PG diagnosis for health professionals. (3) Methods: A CNN was trained with 422 expert-selected pictures of PG and LU. In a man vs. machine contest, 33 pictures of PG and 36 pictures of LU were presented for diagnosis to 18 dermatologists at two maximum care hospitals and to the CNN. The results were statistically evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the CNN and for dermatologists with different experience levels. (4) Results: The CNN achieved a sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84.2−99.9%) and outperformed dermatologists, with a sensitivity of 72.7% (CI 54.4−86.7%) significantly (p < 0.03). However, dermatologists achieved a slightly higher specificity (88.9% vs. 83.3%). (5) Conclusions: For the first time, a deep neural network was demonstrated to be capable of diagnosing PG, solely on the basis of photographs, and with a greater sensitivity compared to that of dermatologists.
(1)背景:坏疽性脓皮病(PG)常发生于小腿,由于缺乏明确的临床诊断标准,将其与传统腿部溃疡(LU)相鉴别是一项具有挑战性的任务。由于治疗理念不同,误诊或延迟诊断会给患者带来很大风险。(2)目的:开发一种深度卷积神经网络(CNN),能够分析伤口照片,以协助医疗专业人员进行PG诊断。(3)方法:使用422张由专家挑选的PG和LU图片对CNN进行训练。在一场人机竞赛中,向两家顶级护理医院的18名皮肤科医生以及CNN展示了33张PG图片和36张LU图片用于诊断。对CNN和不同经验水平的皮肤科医生的结果在敏感性、特异性和准确性方面进行了统计学评估。(4)结果:CNN的敏感性达到97%(95%置信区间(CI)84.2−99.9%),显著优于皮肤科医生,后者的敏感性为72.7%(CI 54.4−86.7%)(p < 0.03)。然而,皮肤科医生的特异性略高(88.9%对83.3%)。(5)结论:首次证明深度神经网络仅基于照片就能诊断PG,且与皮肤科医生相比具有更高的敏感性。