CAS Key Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Center of Conservation Biology, Core Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Ecol Appl. 2024 Jan;34(1):e2795. doi: 10.1002/eap.2795. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
Fluctuating resource availability plays a critical role in determining non-native plant invasions through mediating the competitive balance between non-native and native species. However, the impact of fluctuating resource availability on interactions among non-native species remains largely unknown. This represents a barrier to understanding invasion mechanisms, particularly in habitats that harbor multiple non-native species with different responses to fluctuating resource availability. To examine the responses of non-native plant species to nutrient fluctuations, we compared the growth of each of 12 non-native species found to be common in local natural areas to nutrients supplied at a constant rate or supplied as a single large pulse in a pot experiment. We found that seven species produced more biomass with pulsed nutrients compared to constant nutrients (hereafter "benefitting species"), while the other five species did not differ between nutrient enrichment treatments (hereafter "non-benefitting species"). To investigate how nutrient fluctuations influence the interactions among non-native plant species, we established experimental non-native communities in the field with two benefitting and two non-benefitting non-native species. Compared with constant nutrient supply, the single large pulse of nutrient did not influence community biomass, but strongly increased the biomass and cover of the benefitting species and decreased those of the non-benefitting species. Furthermore, the benefitting species had higher leaf N content and greater plant height when nutrients were supplied as a single large pulse than at a constant rate, whereas the non-benefitting species showed no differences in leaf N content and were shorter when nutrients were supplied as a single large pulse than at a constant rate. Our results add to the growing evidence that the individual responses of non-native species to nutrient fluctuation are species-specific. More importantly, benefitting species were favored by nutrients coming in a pulse, while non-benefitting ones were favored by nutrients coming constantly when they grew together. This suggests that nutrient fluctuations can mediate the competitive balance among non-native plants and may thus determine their invasion success in a community harboring multiple non-native plant species.
资源可利用性的波动在决定非本地植物入侵方面起着关键作用,它通过调节非本地和本地物种之间的竞争平衡来实现。然而,资源可利用性波动对非本地物种之间相互作用的影响在很大程度上仍不清楚。这是理解入侵机制的一个障碍,特别是在那些存在多种对资源可利用性波动有不同响应的非本地物种的栖息地中。为了研究非本地植物物种对养分波动的响应,我们在盆栽实验中比较了 12 种在当地自然区域常见的非本地物种在恒定速率供应养分或单一大量脉冲供应养分时的生长情况。我们发现,与恒定养分相比,有 7 个物种在脉冲养分供应下产生了更多的生物量(以下简称“受益物种”),而其他 5 个物种在养分富集处理之间没有差异(以下简称“非受益物种”)。为了研究养分波动如何影响非本地植物物种之间的相互作用,我们在野外建立了包含两个受益物种和两个非受益物种的实验性非本地群落。与恒定养分供应相比,单一大量脉冲养分供应并没有影响群落生物量,但强烈增加了受益物种的生物量和盖度,降低了非受益物种的生物量和盖度。此外,当养分以单一大量脉冲供应时,受益物种的叶片氮含量和植株高度高于恒定养分供应,而非受益物种的叶片氮含量和植株高度在两种养分供应方式下没有差异。我们的研究结果进一步证明了非本地物种对养分波动的个体响应是物种特异性的。更重要的是,受益物种在养分脉冲供应时更具优势,而非受益物种在养分恒定供应时更具优势,当它们共同生长时,情况就是如此。这表明养分波动可以调节非本地植物之间的竞争平衡,并可能因此决定它们在一个包含多种非本地植物物种的群落中的入侵成功。